Skip to content
#federated learning Open access

Integration of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain: A Systematic Review of Applications, Architectures, Security, and Open Challenges

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security

Abstract

Abstract: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain combines adaptive computation with decentralized trust, cryptographic integrity, programmable transactions, and auditable data exchange. This systematic review synthesizes research on integration architectures, applications, reciprocal benefits, security, privacy, scalability, interoperability, and open challenges. Four recurring integration patterns are examined: AI enhancing blockchain operations, blockchain supporting AI systems, bidirectional AI–blockchain architectures, and decentralized or federated intelligent systems. Applications are considered across healthcare, finance, supply chains, Internet of Things, cybersecurity, energy, smart cities, and education. The review finds that AI can strengthen anomaly detection, fraud analytics, smart-contract analysis, prediction, and network optimization, while blockchain can strengthen data provenance, identity, model traceability, access control, and collaborative learning. However, combined architectures introduce additional trust boundaries involving models, oracles, smart contracts, data pipelines, and cross-system interfaces. Latency, storage growth, interoperability, privacy leakage, model manipulation, poisoning, and governance remain important barriers. The review therefore argues for selective integration: intensive AI computation and sensitive data should generally remain off-chain or in controlled edge/cloud environments, while blockchain should anchor identities, commitments, permissions, provenance, and auditable events. Future research should prioritize verifiable AI outputs, privacy-preserving decentralized learning, trustworthy oracles, cross-chain interoperability, standardized benchmarks, and governance-aware architectures.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.