Skip to content
#federated learning Open access

Federated learning for clinical outcome prediction from structured and temporal health data: A systematic review of performance, heterogeneity, privacy, and clinical translation

Sep 2026 · Open Science Framework

Abstract

Retrospective registration of a PRISMA 2020 systematic review of empirical federated learning (FL) studies that predict individual patient clinical outcomes from structured electronic health records, clinical time series, sensor and text data. The review addresses six research questions: FL algorithms and performance relative to centralized (pooled) and local-only baselines; prediction tasks, temporal structure, datasets and architectures; handling and measured effect of non-IID heterogeneity; privacy mechanisms beyond the base protocol and their utility and resource costs; validation and deployment readiness; and recurring methodological limitations and risk of bias (PROBAST). Five sources were searched on 13 August 2026 (PubMed/MEDLINE, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, ACL Anthology, Google Scholar). Synthesis follows SWiM, using within-study direction-of-effect vote counting, and certainty is rated with a GRADE-informed scheme for prognostic evidence. This registration was made after screening and data extraction had been completed. It records the protocol that was fixed before full-text screening and states which analyses were added after that point.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.