In everyday reasoning and scientific inquiry, explanations help people make sense of their experiences and observations. We investigate how people generate new possible explanations. Specifically, we study how the phrasing of "why" questions shapes exploration of the space of possible explanations. We hypothesized that rephrasing a question comparing two keywords to make one or the other more focal would guide people toward explanations that are more closely related to the focal word. Using a pre-trained machine learning model, we measured how closely each explanation aligned with the comparison words. In Study 1, we manipulated the order of the two keywords and found that explanations aligned more strongly with the earlier words. However, this design did not distinguish whether the effect was driven by the primacy of the words or the pragmatics of the question. In Study 2, we then independently manipulated which word appeared first and which word served as the grammatical subject, and found that participants were more likely to generate explanations related to the subject. These findings highlight how the phrasing of a question can shape explanation generation, demonstrating that pragmatic understanding influences how people explore a conceptual space.
It is proposed that LLMs can serve not only as benchmarks for human-model alignment, but also as tools for investigating the nature of pragmatic phenomena and their relationship to linguistic theory.
A. Lombardi, Alessandro Lenci· International Conference on...· 0 citations
Theories of the mental lexicon must explain how people use context to interpret ambiguous words (e.g., "internal organ" vs. "musical organ") and why people vary on this core aspect of comprehension. Theoretical development has been hampered by the lack of reliable tests of disambiguation skill. We introduce a task in w...
L. M. Blott, A. Gowenlock, A. J. Parker et al.· Quarterly Journal of Experim...· 0 citations
Difficulty is one of the most fundamental properties of a question: it determines whether the question can meaningfully discriminate between models of differing ability. Although a variety of methods can now estimate or predict difficulty automatically, they yield only a single descriptive number, with no account of th...
Peng Cui, Qiao-Yuan Zheng, R. Debelak et al.· 0 citations
The formal study of argumentation-based dialogue lacks a comprehensive reference framework, particularly from a linguistic perspective. This work addresses part of this gap by analysing whether the relationship between the semantic-syntactic structure of questions and their pragmatic features could increase the utility...
Martina Di Bratto, Maria Di Maro· Italian Journal of Computati...· 0 citations
The nature of the mental lexicon remains one of the central controversies in cognitive science, bearing on
fundamental questions concerning the representation and processing of linguistic knowledge. In this article, we examine Gary
Libben’s contributions to the study of lexical representation and processing, with p...
R. D. de Almeida, Lori Buchanan· The Mental Lexicon· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.