Skip to content
Review Open access

Reimagining Pedagogy in the Age of Generative AI: From Teacher-Centered to Intelligence-Augmented Learning

Jun 2026 · International Journal of Active & Healthy Aging · 0 citations

TL;DR

It is concluded that GenAI should serve as a pedagogical assistant for teachers, not a replacement, and effective implementation requires robust AI governance mechanisms, continuous teacher professional development, ethical safeguards, and the promotion of AI literacy.

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), including Large Language Models (LLMs) such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Anthropic Claude, is rapidly transforming the educational landscape from classroom instruction to intelligent learning systems. This study systematically reviews the pedagogical, cognitive, ethical, and governance implications of integrating GenAI into education. A systematic literature review was conducted using publications from Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, ERIC, and Google Scholar spanning 2022–2025. An initial list of 78 studies was identified, and 42 peer-reviewed articles, policy reports, and institutional publications were included for thematic synthesis. The results indicate that GenAI significantly enhances adaptive learning, formative assessment, and personalized instructional support. Empirical findings show that AI-supported writing tasks led to more coherent and organized content. AI-mediated formative feedback positively influenced subsequent learner performance, yielding a 63% increase in coherence and organization in writing tasks and a 27% reduction in revision turnaround time compared to non-AI groups. Furthermore, AI-supported scaffolding boosted engagement and reduced task drop-off rates by 19% in STEM learning environments. Despite these benefits, the review highlights persistent concerns, including academic integrity violations, algorithmic bias, hallucinated information, data privacy risks, and over-reliance on AI-generated content. The study concludes that GenAI should serve as a pedagogical assistant for teachers, not a replacement. Effective implementation requires robust AI governance mechanisms, continuous teacher professional development, ethical safeguards, and the promotion of AI literacy. These measures are essential to ensure equitable, responsible, and sustainable use of intelligence-enabled learning in today’s educational landscape.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Jul 2026

Transformative Roles of Generative Artificial Intelligence as a Co-Instructor: A PRISMA-Guided Systematic Literature Review for Personalized and Sustainable Higher Education

A synthesized conceptual perspective is contributes a synthesized conceptual perspective that integrates pedagogical, ethical, governance, and sustainability dimensions into a unified framework for responsible AI-augmented higher education.

Montadzah A. Abdulgani, Jonathan M. Mantikayan · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Generative Artificial Intelligence in University Efl Education: A Review of Recent Studies and Pedagogical Implications

Across the reviewed studies, generative AI was found to enhance language learning through personalized feedback, increased learner autonomy, and greater learning engagement, but concerns regarding academic integrity, AI literacy, ethical issues, and institutional readiness remain significant challenges to its sustainable implementation.

N. H. Hong Nhung · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

AI-Mediated Writing Instruction in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence

It is suggested that AI can enhance drafting, revision, and feedback processes, improving coherence, metacognition, and writing confidence, however, these benefits are accompanied by persistent concerns regarding ethical ambiguity, inconsistent policy guidance, and insufficient faculty training.

Samira Dichari, Fadi Jaber · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Reframing teacher digital competence for generative AI: a task–capability analysis of multi-platform educational discourse

Positive associations of all five task areas were found in pedagogical assistance; the greatest estimates were made with classroom enactment and professional learning; the competence model is confirmed, which is task sensitive and is based on assessment of capability, orchestration of instruction, the verification of evaluation, mediation of the learner and inquiry of the profession.

Na Zhao · 0 citations
Review Open access Jun 2026

Rethinking Student Assessment in the Era of AI-Assisted Learning

Assessment in Tanzanian higher learning institutions was examined and it was revealed that students integrate AI tools as cognitive extensions, enhancing understanding, argumentation and metacognitive reflection, while lecturers noted benefits alongside challenges in evaluating independent learning.

Nabahani Kimboka, Abeid Hussein Rashid · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Generative Artificial Intelligence as a Cultural Mediator in Higher Education Learning: A Scoping Review

An AI-Mediated Learning Culture Framework is proposed that maps the interrelationships between technological affordances, academic practices, and learner agency and offers directions for empirical research and supports higher education institutions in designing AI-responsive learning environments.

Rachmat Satria · 0 citations