Aug 2026· International Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education· 0 citations
TL;DR
It is argued that AI adoption should not be viewed as a pedagogical rupture, but as a continuation of a long-standing shift toward learner-centred, meaning-focused, and interaction-driven language education.
Abstract
English language teaching (ELT) in higher education has undergone successive pedagogical transformations, evolving from rote memorisation to task-based and communicative approaches, integrating computer-assisted language learning (CALL), and now entering an era of artificial intelligence (AI)–mediated learning. This paper argues that AI adoption should not be viewed as a pedagogical rupture, but as a continuation of a long-standing shift toward learner-centred, meaning-focused, and interaction-driven language education. Situating AI within this trajectory, the paper contends that successful integration relies not on technological novelty, but on research-informed pedagogy, ethical awareness, and evidence-based practice. Echoing a longstanding caution against allowing education to be driven by the measurement of outcomes at the expense of purpose, it asks not what is technologically possible, but what is pedagogically meaningful. To illustrate this argument, the paper presents an action research project documenting the ongoing construction of a new elective course on vocabulary development at a research-focused liberal arts university in Hong Kong. Moving beyond rote memorisation, the course enhances vocabulary acquisition through active learning, textual analysis, and extensive reading, employing techniques such as morphological analysis and contextual inference. Drawing on literary and non-literary materials, it adopts a scaffolded design transitioning from guided instruction to independent learning, fostering critical thinking alongside lexical growth. Through discussions, presentations, and written analyzes understood as a recursive, problem-solving process, students apply new vocabulary in academic and real-world contexts—offering a practical model for pedagogically grounded, AI-mediated vocabulary learning.
The research outcomes demonstrate that AIAS functions effectively as a learning architecture, aligning academic integrity with instructional design, and offers a replicable model for fashion programs and other disciplines seeking responsible AI integration.
D. Shen· PUPIL International Journal...· 0 citations
It is suggested that AI can enhance drafting, revision, and feedback processes, improving coherence, metacognition, and writing confidence, however, these benefits are accompanied by persistent concerns regarding ethical ambiguity, inconsistent policy guidance, and insufficient faculty training.
Samira Dichari, Fadi Jaber· Journal of Education and Tra...· 0 citations
The Pedagogical Prompting Feedback Cycle is offered as a teacher-oriented way of translating existing instructional expertise into AI-supported practice and presented as a tentative conceptual model rather than a validated framework: it is meant to provoke inquiry and design, and it requires empirical validation across...
Ali Khodi, Samantha M. Curle, Víctor Parra-Guinaldo· Frontiers in Education· 1 citation
The paper proposes a set of guiding principles derived from the identified tensions, emphasising teacher-mediated interaction, developmental calibration of AI use, transparency, curriculum alignment, privacy protection and equity considerations, which provide a structured basis for integrating AI in ways that support l...
The study proposes and verifies a framework intended to support curriculum alignment, instructional control, and academic integrity preservation within AI-enabled learning systems, and contributes a systems-oriented framework for embedding AI within educational systems while preserving pedagogical intent and governance...
Ali Ahsan, Hayden McDonald, R. Saha et al.· Systems· 0 citations
The review examines four interrelated design challenges: the pedagogical quality of AI-generated multimedia; the validity and fairness of automatic feedback; the interpretability of learning analytics; and the impact on established instructional design processes.
F. Shahbodin, C. K. Mohd, Z. Maksom et al.· International journal of res...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.