Skip to content
Clinical trial Open access

Efficacy and safety of Programmed Death Ligand 1 inhibitors versus Programmed Death 1 inhibitors in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Jul 2026 · PeerJ · Vol 14, pp. e21402 · 0 citations · 67 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The combination of PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy may provide a significant OS and PFS benefit relative to PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy in NSCLC and a similar safety profile.

Abstract

Background With the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the first-line treatment of driver mutation-negative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare efficacy and adverse effects (AEs) between PD-L1 inhibitors and PD-1 inhibitors. Methods We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to the first-line treatment of NSCLC with ICIs alone or in combination with chemotherapy. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and AEs. Results In total, 28 RCTs involving 14,758 patients were included. Compared with Programmed Death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors plus chemotherapy, Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors plus chemotherapy were associated with worse OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.13–1.41]; P < 0.001) and PFS (HR = 1.21; 95% CI [1.06–1.38]; P = 0.005). The objective response rate (ORR) did not differ between PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy and PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (odds ratio (OR) = 0.91; 95% CI [0.78–1.05], P = 0.205), and AE rates were similar between these groups. Regarding monotherapy, no difference in OS, PFS, or ORR was observed between PD-L1 and PD-1 inhibitors. The incidence of AEs leading to treatment termination and grade ≥3 AEs was lower for PD-L1 inhibitors than PD-1 inhibitors (risk ratio (RR) = 0.55; 95% CI [0.32–0.95]; P = 0.03; RR = 0.76; 95% CI [0.60–0.96]; P = 0.021). Conclusions The combination of PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy may provide a significant OS and PFS benefit relative to PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy in NSCLC and a similar safety profile. Meanwhile, PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy appears less likely to result in treatment termination or grade ≥3 AEs than PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#small language model Review Open access Aug 2026

Factors influencing the efficacy of programmed cell death protein 1 / programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer

Current evidence supports PD-L1 as the most widely implemented biomarker, but no single factor adequately captures the biological and temporal heterogeneity of treatment response, so integrated, dynamic, and context-specific biomarker models are required to improve precision immuno-oncology.

Long-Hua Lu, Ze-Yang Zeng, Zi-Qi Guan et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors versus chemotherapy or cetuximab in the treatment of platinum-refractory recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Introduction This meta-analysis was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors versus chemotherapy or cetuximab in the treatment of platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). Materials and Methods Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science,...

Zhong-Ji Chen, Zhong Zhong, Weiming Liang et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Efficacy and safety of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors combinations for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

First-line ICI-chemotherapy combinations improved survival outcomes but increased the risk of irAEs, with no significant differences in efficacy or safety among ICI-chemotherapy combinations.

Xiao-Qi Ye, Haoru Meng, Qiuyan Guo et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Tolerance and Efficacy of Targeted Therapies After Immunotherapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers Harboring Oncogenic Alterations: The GFPC-TOXIMAD Study

Simple Summary In patients with advanced lung cancer harboring targetable gene mutations, sequential immunotherapy-targeted therapy was associated with higher rate of adverse events. A short delay between last immunotherapy administration and targeted therapy administration may increase the risk of serious adverse even...

Thomas Pierret, J. Auliac, C. Ricordel et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

First-line immune checkpoint inhibitor plus anti-angiogenic therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background The meta-analysis assesses the efficacy and safety of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus anti-angiogenic therapies versus sunitinib in advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The analysis places focus on differential benefits across International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium...

Zijing Liu, Yu Jiang, Zhi-Hao Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Meta-analysis Aug 2026

Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The findings indicate that immune checkpoint inhibitors represent a potentially effective treatment option for patients with cervical cancer; however, their safety profile warrants careful consideration.

Yuan-Yuan Li, Song-Yi Wang, Yi-Rui Mai et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.