Skip to content
Preprint

MedCalc-R1: Knowledge-Guided Reward Framework for Medical Mathematical Reasoning

Aug 2026 · 2 citations · 32 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed knowledge-guided hybrid reward framework significantly outperforms existing baselines in both reasoning accuracy and generalization capability, validating the effectiveness and applicability in safety-critical domains.

Abstract

In Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) frameworks for mathematical reasoning tasks, floating-point results are typically evaluated using a tolerance-based reward. However, this strategy suffers from challenges such as difficulty in threshold calibration, unstable training dynamics, and limited accuracy, especially in clinical scenarios. To address these limitations, we propose a knowledge-guided hybrid reward framework (\textsc{MedCalc-R1}). Specifically, we introduce a knowledge verification reward mechanism that enforces explicit generation of computational formulas, which are further validated by an external verifier to enhance interpretability and reasoning reliability. Furthermore, we design a hybrid soft-hard reward scheme combining a hard constraint based on clinical safety thresholds with a soft, precision-sensitive reward that progressively guides learning within the acceptable range. Experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms existing baselines in both reasoning accuracy and generalization capability, validating the effectiveness and applicability in safety-critical domains.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Improving Generalization Robustness of Multimodal RLVR

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) makes Multimodal Large Language Models more accurate, but the gains are brittle: simply paraphrasing a question or changing the prompt template can degrade them, which challenges reliable deployment in high-stakes scenarios like medical VQA. We trace this to two iss...

P. Zhou, Zhiwei Tang, Xiaopeng Peng et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

StructReward: Efficient Structured Process Rewards for Self-Correcting Multimodal Reasoning

This work introduces StructReward, a compute-efficient framework that provides dense reinforcement signals through structured step-level reward alignment and substantially reduces the computational overhead of multimodal reinforcement learning.

Yifan Li, Ruxi Sun, Tong-Zhou Zhao · 0 citations
Review Open access 2020

Explainable Reinforcement Learning for Transparent Automation

This work reviews pre-2019 XRL approaches, categorizing them into policy explanation, reward decomposition, model transparency, and post-hoc interpretability methods, and proposes a framework that combines interpretable policies, surrogate models, attention mechanisms, and visualization techniques to enhance transparen...

Michael Anderson, David Thompson · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

MedAgent-R1: Faithfulness-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Evidence-Grounded Medical Reasoning

This work identifies a systematic failure mode in RL-trained retrieval agents: outcome-only rewards improve accuracy while degrading faithfulness, a phenomenon the authors term confident hallucination, and addresses this with a faithfulness-gated reward design.

Jiangyuan Chen, Cheng-Hao Zhang, Hengxing Cai · 0 citations
#reinforcement learning Open access Aug 2026

Neurosymbolic Reasoning with Incremental Knowledge for Sample Efficient Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning

This work proposes neurosymbolic HRL with {\em Incremental Knowledge (InK), where symbolic high-level components perform symbolic planning on an updatable representation of current InK, while low-level goal-conditioned neural modules learn motion primitives through experience using reward shaping.

Subrat Prasad Panda, B. Genest, A. Easwaran · 0 citations
Book Open access Aug 2026

MedJudge: Medical Multimodal Reward Modeling

This work introduces MedJudge, a multimodal medical reward modeling method that supports interpretable, evidence-grounded, and clinically-aligned decision evaluation, and proposes UMLS-based Concept Overlap (UCO) to evaluate explanation quality, measuring concept-level alignment with clinician expectations.

Yun-Hong He, Kai Zhang, Jiarong Qian et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.