Skip to content

Knowledge-Guided Synthetic Bug Feedback for LLM-Based Unit Test Generation

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.11573 · 0 citations · 58 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

The results suggest that organizing real-bug mechanisms as retrievable and executable feedback targets is an effective way to guide generated tests toward bug-triggering inputs and behavioral oracles.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have opened new opportunities for unit test generation, but executable tests do not necessarily reveal real defects. This paper studies how historical real-bug mechanisms can be transformed into executable feedback targets for LLM-based unit test generation. The proposed framework constructs structural and semantic representations of real-bug records, retrieves mechanisms applicable to a focal method, and instantiates them as synthetic bugs that guide iterative test enhancement. We evaluate the approach on method-level real-bug detection tasks from Defects4J and show that mechanism-guided synthetic-bug feedback improves real-bug detection over execution-, coverage-, mutation-, knowledge-, and search-based baselines. The results suggest that organizing real-bug mechanisms as retrievable and executable feedback targets is an effective way to guide generated tests toward bug-triggering inputs and behavioral oracles.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Improving Bug Detection in LLM-Generated Unit Tests: Revisiting Test-Oracle Reliability Across Modern Large Language Models

This paper presents a formal mathematical model for categorizing the outcome of generated-tests into four classes, a couple of basic metrics: Bug-Revealing Rate (BRR) and Bug-Validating Rate (BVR); and two basic statistical tests to ensure that the results are rigorous.

Zeyad Farooq Lutfi · 0 citations
Jul 2026

LLM-Based Invariant Testing for Software Functional Bugs

LISA iteratively generates API sequences and program invariants guided by API n-gram feedback, achieving higher bug-detection rates and competitive code coverage compared with both fuzzing and prior LLM-based test generation approaches, and reporting each finding as a high-confidence bug candidate for developer confirm...

Ruogu Yang, Yifeng He, Yundi Xu et al. · 0 citations
Conference Jul 2026

Improving LLM-Based Unit Test Generation Through Root-Cause-Driven Prompt Design

This paper addresses automated unit test generation with large language models (LLMs). LLM-based test generation has not yet attained a quality level sufficient for practical use in industry. Although LLMs often reproduce API syntax faithfully, they frequently disregard semantic usage constraints and execution-environm...

Mizuki Yamada, Masahiko Kato, Juichi Takahashi · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Beyond Fail-to-Pass: Iterative Hardening of Co-Generated Bug Reproduction Tests and Fixes

CoHarden is proposed, a co-generation framework that uses the Lax signal as an in-loop convergence criterion that generates a test before any fix, then iteratively hardens the test and fix against surviving mutation patches until the generated test no longer admits Lax regressions.

Yuhao Tan, Zhibang Yang, Fangkai Yang et al. · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.