Skip to content

Breaking the Environment Wall: Evolving LLM Agent Environments for Recursive Self-Improvement

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 19 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Env-Rethink is proposed, a system with 27B post-trained model that supports three main capabilities that adaptively builds Collection Maps and Event Logs to supplement necessary context and evolves environments through virtual event histories that alter environmental states and evidence relationships.

Abstract

Many real-world tasks (e.g., office workflows, scientific experimentation) require LLM agents to interact repeatedly with their environments for context-dependent operations. However, such environments are often not agent-ready. First, information is often scattered and fragmented across the environment. Second, relevant evidence in the environment is often mixed with misleading information and conflicting versions. Third, environments evolve over time, introducing new noise and more challenging tasks. These challenges can substantially degrade performance for state-of-the-art AI agents (e.g., from 83.9% to 57.6%). To address these challenges, we propose Env-Rethink (a system with 27B post-trained model) that supports three main capabilities: (1) It adaptively builds Collection Maps (for organizing related files) and Event Logs (for contextualizing cross-data relationships) to supplement necessary context; (2) It further leverages the post-trained model (through offline trajectory learning) to identify underlying noise issues in the environment; (3) It ultimately evolves environments through virtual event histories that alter environmental states and evidence relationships, producing more tricky ones for further agent improvement. Experiments show that Env-Rethink can effectively improve downstream task performance (with over 15.1% rubric pass rate improvement across nine models on 30 tasks).

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Sep 2026

Breaking the Environment Wall: A Unified Framework for Preparing and Evolving Agent-Native Environments

Many real-world tasks (e.g., office workflows, scientific experimentation) require LLM agents to interact repeatedly with their environments for context-dependent operations. However, such environments are often not agent-ready. First, information is often scattered and fragmented across the environment. Second, releva...

Yu-Kai Wu, Yuan-Jing Yang, Leon Zhou et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

Learning Simple Test-Time Environments for LLM Web Agents

This work proposes that LLM web agents can learn simple environment observations at test time, and introduces trial steps for agents to decompose a complex environment observation into sub-modules, and implements a label-free learning method, Test-Time Environment Decomposition (TTED), to adapt agent behaviors with exp...

Jun-Xuan Li, Zijun Liu, Zi-Yi Huang et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

AnyAct: Universal Action for Self-Evolving Agents

As large language models (LLMs) advance, AI agents are increasingly deployed in open-world environments to tackle complex sequential tasks (e.g., document processing, cross-application collaboration), relying heavily on actions ranging from GUI operations to semantic APIs. However, three core challenges persist: the"sc...

Ling-Rui Xu, Ya Jiang, Jia-Chang Zhang et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

RefCon: Iterative Refinement and Contrastive Memory Extraction for Context-Evolving Agent

Long-horizon agent interactions generate useful but noisy experience, and retraining models to absorb it is expensive. Context-evolving agents therefore need memory extraction methods that improve with more test-time compute without relying on gold labels. We propose RefCon, which combines sequential self-refinement wi...

Ubaidillah Ariq Prathama, Bo Liu, Yeonsun Hong et al. · 0 citations
Conference Open access Sep 2026

A Review on Test-Time Scaling for Agentic Large Language Models

A novel RAIE taxonomy along four scaling dimensions is proposed, which optimizes the entire thought process through search algorithms and self-verification, and introduces a task-oriented guideline for choosing the best TTS strategy.

Jia-Yu An, Zheng Chen, Yong-Cheng Jing et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.