This work proposes a framework that exposes backbone depth V, action expert depth A, and denoising steps $D$ as three jointly configurable compute axes in a VLA, and introduces a KV Cache synthesis mechanism that manages the missing keys and values of the skipped backbone layers, allowing the action expert to exit deeper than the backbone.
Abstract
Flow-matching Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have emerged as a potential solution for generalist robot control, designed by combining a pretrained Vision-Language Model (VLM) backbone with an action expert that generates continuous robot actions. While these models exhibit impressive capabilities, due to their very high number of parameters, their computational requirements are often prohibitive for robotics control. To mitigate these inefficiencies, existing methods predominantly skip VLM backbone layers with early exits or reduce denoising steps, while leaving action expert depth untouched. We propose a framework that exposes backbone depth $V$, action expert depth $A$, and denoising steps $D$ as three jointly configurable compute axes in a VLA. Starting from a pretrained VLA, we attach lightweight Exit Transformers (ET) at intermediate depths in both the backbone and the action expert, trained to distil the last layer of the policy into each exit. Furthermore, we introduce a KV Cache synthesis mechanism that manages the missing keys and values of the skipped backbone layers, allowing the action expert to exit deeper than the backbone. Finally, we show that the optimal compute budget is task-dependent, with different tasks benefiting from different axes and depths. Notably, our method does not require training the original policy from scratch, and for each exit, it increases the number of parameters by only $2.1\%$ for SmolVLA and $4.1\%$ for $\pi_{0.5}$. We validate our approach across two flow-matching VLAs (SmolVLA, $\pi_{0.5}$) and two benchmarks (LIBERO, Meta-World), revealing complementary effects: $V$ and $A$ respectively reduce FLOPs and latency, while $D$ improves both. Our joint configurations $(V,A,D)$ reduce latency by $79.2\%$ and computation (FLOPs) by $31.8\%$, while improving mean success rate by $5.6\%$.
Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 1...
Kian Hosseinkhani, Qin-He Peng, George Shramko et al.· 0 citations
Robion is designed, the first VLA serving and management system for multi-robot, multi-model requests on multi-GPU edge servers that meets SLOs and enables flexible model placements on multi-GPU servers, and integrates an intelligent traffic controller.
Dionysios Adamopoulos, Nattapol Chanpaisit, Basel Fakhri et al.· 0 citations
The results suggest that dense to MoE adaptation with dynamic expert deactivation is a practical direction for reducing active VLA model size without severe performance loss.
Mu-Chun Niu, Shuang Chen, Yu-Zhou Wu et al.· 0 citations
Vision-language-action (VLA) policies based on flow matching generate action chunks through repeated evaluations of an action expert. Increasing the number of integration steps raises inference cost, but does not necessarily improve closed-loop success. We propose Coda, which reallocates part of this integration budget...
Zhi-Peng Tang, Xin-Da Chen, Wei-Ning Rao et al.· 0 citations
Reactive vision-language-action (VLA) policies suffer from task-state aliasing in long-horizon manipulation, where identical multimodal inputs call for distinct, context-dependent actions. Given that pretrained VLAs already possess rich control primitives to express diverse behaviors, we hypothesize that the execution...
Heng-Yan Liu, Wen-Lve Zhou, Bo Yue et al.· 0 citations
Flow-based vision-language-action (VLA) models are highly effective for generalist robot manipulation, yet their reliance on computationally expensive VLM encoding and multi-step iterative action generation imposes a significant latency bottleneck. The resulting inference latency makes it difficult for robots to respon...
Yu-Han Chen, Ke Yu, Peng-Fei Liu et al.· 0 citations