Skip to content
Conference Open access

Safety-Aware Shared Autonomy via World-Model Constrained Planning

Sep 2026 · Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 0 citations · 27 references

TL;DR

World Model Assisted Safety Planning is proposed, a model-predictive shared autonomy framework for explicit safety constraint satisfaction that substantially reduces safety violations while preserving task performance and reducing unnecessary interventions over prior shared autonomy baselines.

Abstract

Safety-aware shared autonomy aims to enable an autonomous agent to collaborate with a human operator, completing tasks under safety constraints while maximally preserving human intent. However, existing methods often underperform in long-horizon tasks that require balancing task performance under safety constraints with the degree of intervention—particularly when accurately predicting future unsafe events is critical. This limitation largely stems from their reliance on the current state alone to decide when to intervene and how to modify actions. We propose World Model Assisted Safety Planning (WASP), a model-predictive shared autonomy framework for explicit safety constraint satisfaction. We first formulate a safety-aware world model, and leverage its online predictive reasoning to decide when to intervene by jointly assessing prospective safety violations and degradation in task performance, thereby intervening only when necessary while enforcing safety constraints at decision time. Once intervention is triggered, WASP plans a short-horizon residual correction using world model rollouts, filters out unsafe candidates, and executes the least-deviating correction among the remaining high-return options in a receding-horizon loop. Experiments across diverse vision-based safety-critical domains show that WASP substantially reduces safety violations while preserving task performance and reducing unnecessary interventions over prior shared autonomy baselines.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Preprint Sep 2026

Regret Dominates Surprise: Design-Time Requirements Engineering for Agentic-AI Safety

A novel Regret-Dominance Mechanism (MS-RGR) is introduced to operationalize safe autonomy in agentic-AI systems, and is positioned as initial feasibility evidence for design-time safety constraints in agentic-AI requirements engineering.

Nuwayyir Almohammadi, Rami Bahsoon, Tao-An Chen · 0 citations
#computer vision Preprint Aug 2026

SafeBranch: Branch-Pair Safety Alignment for Embodied Agents

SafeBranch is proposed, a framework that aligns an embodied actor on safety through branch pairs constructed from the actor's own unsafe rollouts via environment rollback, achieving roughly ten times more safe successes than the untrained baseline on the unseen-object variant.

Hyunse Lee, Jiwoo Jeong, Haneul Lee et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Safety-Aware Event-Triggered Intervention for Motion Planning and Decision Making in Diffusion-Based Autonomous Driving

The proposed safety-aware event-triggered intervention framework on top of a fixed DiffusionDriveV2 planner can diagnose and partially alleviate the gap between risk recognition and action realization, while revealing that stronger semantic-conditioned action generation is needed to fully overcome the trigger-to-action...

Xue-Rui Fang, Hui Li, Ze-Hao Xue et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Courteous Anticipation: Improving Long-Lived Task Planning in Persistent Shared Environments

This work presents courteous anticipatory planning, wherein a model-based planner proposes candidate plans and selects the one that jointly minimizes immediate cost and aggregated expected future cost across all robots, estimated via independent per-robot learned estimators.

Md Ridwan Hossain Talukder, Roshan Dhakal, Elizabeth Phillips et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Rethinking World Models for Safety-Critical Embodied Systems

It is argued that future world models should move beyond predicting likely futures toward identifying which futures matter, revising judgments through experience, and recognizing when to act, revise, sense, defer, or abstain.

Kai-Lang Ma, Heyang Huang, Inhi Kim et al. · 0 citations
Conference Aug 2026

DA-MCTS: Deadline-Aware Action Exploration for Safe Real-Time Planning

Real-time motion planning for autonomous racing must operate under strict computational deadlines while maintaining safe and reliable behavior. However, the quality and safety of planning algorithms depend heavily on the computational budget available on the deployment hardware. Policies tuned on powerful systems can b...

Samir Gupta, Michael Yuhas, Abhishek Dubey · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.