Aug 2026· European Journal of Research in Applied Sciences· Vol 72, pp. 534 - 548· 1 citation· 28 references
TL;DR
The results indicate that the enhancement of digital governance necessitates not only infrastructural development but also a persistent commitment to institutional responsiveness in order to fortify legitimacy and citizens’ trust.
Abstract
Despite the proliferation of internet access and ongoing governmental initiatives, the engagement of citizens with digital governance platforms continues to be markedly constrained. Situated within the framework of the e-participation paradigm, this research investigates digital participation as a catalyst for service responsiveness, institutional trust and the perceived quality of life. A systematic review adhering to PRISMA guidelines (2010–2023), coupled with a qualitative case study of India’s MyGov platform, delineates seven obstacles to e-participation, which are classified into technical (digital illiteracy, connectivity deficiencies and accessibility limitations) and non-technical (distrust, political disengagement, insufficient awareness and agenda misalignment) categories. Exploratory interviews conducted with university/college students unveil a paradox: Digital competence does not guarantee engagement when the perceived relevance and policy responsiveness are inadequate. The results indicate that the enhancement of digital governance necessitates not only infrastructural development but also a persistent commitment to institutional responsiveness in order to fortify legitimacy and citizens’ trust.
Digital government can widen opportunities for citizens to obtain information, express views, and contribute to public decisions. However, the availability of online platforms does not guarantee equal or meaningful participation. Citizens may remain excluded because of unreliable access, limited digital skills, inacces...
A. Amirova, M. Mukanov· Journal of Governance, Econo...· 0 citations
Digital public participation platforms have been adopted worldwide, yet a fundamental question remains unresolved: what makes such participation democratically valuable? The core problem this paper addresses is that existing evaluation frameworks cannot detect a critical gap: a platform can run for many years on sophis...
Smart city initiatives increasingly claim to be citizen-centric, yet governance frameworks persistently conflate two analytically distinct concepts, citizen participation and citizen engagement, in ways that undermine the design and evaluation of civic involvement mechanisms. This conceptual ambiguity represents a stru...
Kátia Eloisa Bertol, E. Luciano, R. Barichello et al.· Sustainability· 0 citations
In an era of digital technologies, citizenship, communication, and democratic participation have been fundamentally restructured and new forms of civic engagement in digitally mediated public spheres have emerged. Digital platforms have facilitated new ways of publicizing and participating in politics, but they have al...
S. Nasir· Journal of Language, Literat...· 0 citations
Digital activism has become an important avenue through which Nigerian youths, particularly Generation Z (Gen Z), demand accountability and participate in governance. Between 2020 and 2026, movements such as #EndSARS, the Obidient Movement, and #EndBadGovernance demonstrated how social media has evolved from a communic...
Ezeanyanike Anurika, Yillah Ishaku· International Journal of Pub...· 0 citations
This Open Letter argues that meaningful digital participation requires a fundamental rethinking of how political organisations active in the field of politics design, deploy, and sustain the tools intended to (re)engage hard-to-reach groups in society. It does so by drawing on insights that emerged from a roundtable...
Justine Brunet, Caroline Close, Lucas Kins et al.· Open Research Europe· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.