This edited volume brings together a highly qualified and diverse team of international scholars to examine how cultural heritage operates as a field of global engagement at the intersection of diplomacy, dialogue, and mediated cultural practice. It advances a conceptual shift from heritage as a state instrument of soft power to heritage as a relational and mobile process that travels across borders and is continually reworked through institutions, publics, and platforms. Within this framework, dialogue is approached not as a normative outcome but as a contingent and situationally produced mode of engagement shaped by power, mediation, and context. Taking China’s evolving heritage practices as a particularly revealing vantage point, the volume explores how heritage is mobilized, interpreted, and contested amid intensifying geopolitical tensions and resurgent cultural nationalism, while also speaking to dynamics that extend beyond the Chinese case. Contributors from heritage studies, international relations, media and communication, cultural studies, and China studies bring interdisciplinary perspectives and draw on qualitative methods including ethnography, critical discourse analysis, multimodal analysis, and comparative case studies. This methodological breadth enables the volume to move across scales, from international governance and diplomatic initiatives to urban spaces, digital platforms, and everyday intercultural encounters. Collectively, the chapters reposition heritage as a dynamic site of negotiation, mediation, and meaning-making, offering critical insights into the role of heritage in shaping global narratives, cultural identities, and the possibilities and limits of international dialogue in a changing world.
Against the backdrop of globalisation, transnational education, the mobility of people and the rapid development of digital media, the concept of cultural exchange between China and the West has shifted from a binary opposition of ‘Chinese culture versus Western culture’ to an exploration of ‘how cultural meaning is pr...
Qiu-Mei Qu· Research Journal of Human an...· 0 citations
This article examines the discursive construction of the metaverse as it circulates across media, professional, political, and academic arenas. Drawing on a cross-media and cross-platform corpus of 22 567 digital documents (including posts on X, YouTube videos, podcasts, radio and television broadcasts, press articles,...
Jaércio da Silva· Studies in Communication Sci...· 1 citation
The rapid digitalization of diplomatic practice has transformed how states communicate, negotiate, and project influence in the global arena. This article examines the role of multilingualism as a strategic, political, and sociocultural component of digital diplomacy. While much scholarship has focused on technological...
This important volume tackles the discourse of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict from an interdisciplinary perspective with a focus on language and communication, constituting a novel approach in the literature on the topic.By drawing on methods from linguistics, media studies, digital culture, journalism, and literatur...
In this review article, two independently authored texts examine how modernist architecture on the African continent continues to shape and be reshaped by the operations that actively produce memory. The authors approach these operations in individual yet interconnected analyses of building ‘performance’, both a tool o...
Piero Medici, Anna Kintsurashvili· Footprint· 0 citations
Today’s globalisation, migration patterns, multilingual realities and digital forms of communication have put la guage-as-a-territorial-culturally-contained-system under pressure. This study analyses the way in which social, cultural, literary and technological boundaries are crossed, trespassed and reconfigured by lin...
J. Sekar· Journal of Social Sciences a...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.