Aug 2026· International Journal of Philosophy, Ethics and Humanities· 0 citations· 12 references
TL;DR
The study argues that collaborative intelligence should be viewed as an organizational capability rather than merely a technological outcome, requiring deliberate management of human judgment, ethical responsibility, and organizational design.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming organizational work by enabling humans and intelligent systems to collaborate in decision-making, problem-solving, and operational activities. Despite rapid adoption, existing research remains fragmented across organizational behavior, human factors, information systems, and AI governance, providing limited guidance on how organizations can effectively design and manage human–AI collaboration. This conceptual paper develops the Collaborative Intelligence Framework (CIF) through an integrative review of peer-reviewed literature published between 2020 and 2026. The framework identifies four essential conditions for successful human–AI teaming: task interdependence, calibrated trust, role clarity, and organizational enablement. It explains how these conditions promote effective collaboration while reducing the risks of algorithmic aversion and excessive reliance on AI recommendations. The study argues that collaborative intelligence should be viewed as an organizational capability rather than merely a technological outcome, requiring deliberate management of human judgment, ethical responsibility, and organizational design. The paper contributes to the growing literature on responsible AI by providing a structured framework that can guide researchers and practitioners in designing sustainable human–AI collaboration. It concludes by discussing managerial implications, study limitations, and opportunities for future empirical validation across diverse organizational and occupational contexts.
Keywords: organizational behavior; human-AI collaboration; human-AI teaming; collaborative intelligence; future of work; comple-mentarity
This paper examines how AI reshapes managerial decision-making by distinguishing decision augmentation from decision automation, and considers the governance tensions between centralized and decentralized approaches to AI deployment, as well as identifying the leadership competencies that gain value once routine manage...
R. Narenderajan· Scholedge International Jour...· 0 citations
The research develops a framework which demonstrates how human–AI teamwork leads to increased work output, better decision making, and improved operational performance, and offers practical guidance for organizations seeking to improve productivity, decision quality, operational efficiency, and long-term business perfo...
Kuljeet Kaur· International journal of com...· 0 citations
The eight contributions examine how design choices such as human‐likeness and gendered cues shape perceptions of AI, how AI alters team processes including decision‐making, trust, and stress, and how training and organizational integration condition sustainable human–AI collaboration.
Anna‐Sophie Ulfert, Eleni Georganta, G. Grote· Journal of Organizational Be...· 2 citations
The findings indicate that effective Human–AI collaboration significantly improves operational efficiency, decision-making quality, employee engagement, and innovation capability and presents a strategic pathway for organizations seeking sustainable growth in the era of intelligent enterprises.
Jaganathan Balaji· International Journal Of Rec...· 0 citations
This paper proposes an **Intelligent Human–AI Collaboration Framework for Future Digital Workplaces** consisting of four stages: workplace data integration, intelligent knowledge processing, collaborative decision intelligence, and adaptive feedback optimization.
Narendra Karmarkar, Iyengar P. K.· International Journal of Eme...· 0 citations
This article synthesizes recent scholarship and practitioner experience into a structured playbook for executives, design leaders, and human resources partners that argues that the value of HAIC depends on three deliberate design choices: who initiates the collaboration, how broad the AI's knowledge scope must be, and...
Jonathan H. Westover· Human Capital Leadership Rev...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.