Skip to content
Preprint

EgoGazeLite: On-Device Egocentric Gaze Prediction for Token-Efficient Multimodal LLM Video Input

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 28 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

EgoGazeLite, a lightweight dual-process gaze predictor for egocentric video understanding with MLLMs that removes the need for eye-tracking hardware for token-efficient, gaze-conditioned egocentric video understanding with MLLMs.

Abstract

The use of multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) for egocentric video understanding with wearable devices is constrained by the token budget. Memory and compute cost scale with the number of visual tokens, and high-resolution video quickly becomes expensive to transmit and process at scale. Prior work (GazeLLM) addresses this by cropping the video around the camera wearer's gaze. This reduces the number of visual tokens by about tenfold while maintaining or improving the quality of full-resolution descriptions. However, this compression strategy depends on dedicated eye-tracking hardware, which is unavailable on consumer smart glasses. Building a software-only substitute poses a joint constraint: the predictor must be accurate enough to preserve downstream description quality, yet light enough to run on-device, within the power and compute budget of a smartphone. We address this with EgoGazeLite, a lightweight dual-process gaze predictor for egocentric video. Across two MLLMs, three automated metrics, and two LLM judges, predicted-gaze crops show no significant difference from ground-truth-gaze crops. Equivalence is confirmed in all ten cases. EgoGazeLite achieves this at 15.7M parameters, 6.71 GFLOPs, and runs the full gaze-and-crop pipeline end-to-end in real time (21.6 ms/frame) on consumer accelerator hardware. Together, these results remove the need for eye-tracking hardware for token-efficient, gaze-conditioned egocentric video understanding with MLLMs.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Motion-Based Tokenization for Cross-Dataset Egocentric Gaze Modeling

Motion-based tokenization provides a compact representation for event-aligned egocentric gaze streams, while the evaluation identifies how target predictability and event construction shape cross-dataset conclusions.

Virmarie Maquiling, Zhuojiang Cai, Enkelejda Kasneci · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

TT-VidT: Decoupling the Temporal Axis for Efficient Motion-Centric Video Pretraining

Comparisons in video self-supervised learning often evaluate complete training recipes rather than isolating the method itself: architecture, objective, data exposure, schedule, scale, and decoder capacity can all vary at once. This makes it hard to identify which choices yield motion-prioritized representations, whose...

Shih-Ying Yeh, Daniel Z. Kaplan, Xue-Hai Wang et al. · 0 citations
Book Open access Sep 2026

A Staged Workflow for Driver Glance and Hand-State Annotation

Naturalistic driving video captures how drivers supervise under real road conditions, but converting long, multi-camera in-cabin footage into behavioral features still relies on manual coding, which is costly and hard to scale. We present a human-in-the-loop workflow that converts raw in-cabin video into two reviewable...

Zhi-Xiong Wang, Ze-Yun Du, Yuwen Chen et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

KaleidoEye: A Large-scale Dataset and Benchmark for Slippage Robust Gaze Tracking in HMDs.

Egocentric gaze tracking is essential for immersive interaction on head-mounted displays (HMDs). However, existing studies typically assume a fixed and tightly fitted headset placement, overlooking the inevitable HMD slippage under real-world conditions. Although several datasets with variable wearing positions have be...

Ying-Xi Li, Xiao-Wei Bai, Liang Xie et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Ambient @ EgoProactive 2026 : Proactive Egocentric Assistance with Visually Grounded Supervision

This submission to the EgoProactive track of the ECCV 2026 Wearable AI Challenge is presented, which ranked first in the large-model division and second in the<=2B division, suggesting that visual grounding is more important than annotation volume for this task.

Logesh Kumar Umapathi · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.