Skip to content
#reinforcement learning Dataset Open access

The need for uncertainty: why probabilistic LSTMs are key to improving flood predictions and enabling learned warning rules

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

Code and results accompanying the EGUsphere preprint egusphere-2026-469. This repository implements deep-learning rainfall–runoff models over the CAMELS-CH basins, comparing a deterministic LSTM baseline against three probabilistic output heads — a DRN model (called LD-LSTM in the code), a Bernstein Quantile Network (BQN), and a Countable Mixture of Asymmetric Laplacians (CMAL, kappa-parameterized) — each trained across 5 seeds and combined into an ensemble. Built on top of these forecasts is FRiCA, a PPO-based reinforcement-learning agent for flood early-warning decision-making. Included: hy2dl/ — the core model, training, and evaluation library. notebooks/sb2025/ — all notebooks used to produce the manuscript's results: per-model training, ensembling, and the final plotting/tables notebook. data/FRiCA/ — pre-built episode data for the FRiCA agent. results/sb2025/ — the combined prediction files needed to reproduce the manuscript's tables and figures, plus the final figures themselves. Raw per-seed training outputs are omitted to keep this archive's size manageable. environment.yml / requirements.txt for a reproducible Python environment. Reproducing the manuscript's tables and figures (via sb2025_plots_rev1.ipynb) requires no external data. Retraining models from scratch additionally requires the CAMELS-CH dataset (Höge et al., 2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5755-2023), which is not redistributed here. See the included README for environment setup instructions and a full notebook-by-notebook guide.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.