Sep 2026· Smart and Sustainable Built Environment· pp. 1-26· 0 citations· 75 references
TL;DR
Findings show that technological and governance barriers dominate smart city–enabled disaster management, ranking highest in Fuzzy AHP and emerging as key causal drivers in Fuzzy DEMATEL.
Abstract
Smart city technologies are increasingly promoted to enhance disaster resilience in urban areas exposed to natural hazards; however, their implementation remains constrained by multiple interrelated technological, governance, social and economic barriers. This study aims to identify, prioritize and analyze the systemic barriers influencing smart city applications in disaster management, reveal their causal interrelationships, and evaluate the phase-specific suitability of smart city technology clusters through an integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework.
The study applies hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria-decision-making framework to develop a phase-based taxonomy of smart city technologies for disaster management. A systematic literature review identifies key barriers, which are then weighted using Fuzzy AHP based on expert judgments. Fuzzy DEMATEL is used to uncover causal relationships among barriers and Fuzzy TOPSIS ranks smart city technology clusters by their suitability across disaster management phases. The framework translates qualitative evidence into a structured, causal, and quantitative decision-support approach.
Findings show that technological and governance barriers dominate smart city–enabled disaster management, ranking highest in Fuzzy AHP and emerging as key causal drivers in Fuzzy DEMATEL. Fuzzy TOPSIS indicates phase-dependent technology suitability: analytics/AI and digital twins are most effective for mitigation and preparedness, while communication and citizen interaction tools become more critical in response and recovery.
Unlike previous studies that primarily examine individual technologies, isolated disaster phases or implementation barriers, this study introduces a phase-based taxonomy and an integrated decision-support framework that explicitly links systemic barriers with the suitability of smart city technology clusters across the disaster management cycle. By combining Fuzzy-based replicable MCDM framework, the study enables quantitative barrier prioritization, causal analysis and phase-specific technology evaluation. The proposed framework is adaptable to different disaster types and regional contexts, supporting comparative analysis and evidence-based planning for disaster-resilient smart cities.
Urban resilience is a critical component of disaster risk governance, particularly in regions exposed to multiple natural, technological, and environmental hazards. This study proposes an integrated spatial decision-support framework that combines disaster risk, resilience capacity, and institutional responsibilities t...
Evaluating and improving community disaster risk reduction capacity (CDRRC) is a crucial concern in the theory and application of urban catastrophe management. Nonetheless, current evaluation frameworks frequently concentrate on a solitary discipline or a restricted array of metrics, while capacity-building initiatives...
Whether digital governance can be converted into measurable disaster-mitigation performance is an important criterion for evaluating smart-city development. Taking China's national smart-city pilot program as a quasi-natural experiment, this study uses a balanced panel of 300 prefecture-level cities from 2009 to 2023 a...
Xian-Zhu Nie· Journal of Applied Economics...· 0 citations
Urban flooding poses significant challenges to public safety, environmental sustainability, and socio-economic development, particularly in rapidly urbanizing cities in the Philippines, such as Calamba City. Effective prioritization of flood risk management strategies is therefore critical to support evidence-based urb...
Rusty Keith E. Placino, Aldous Glenri Baliton, Romalaine Chrisselle Bonoan et al.· E3S Web of Conferences· 0 citations
Coastal African cities face growing flood risks due to climate change, rapid urbanization, and inadequate infrastructure. This study examines flood risk and resilience strategies in four representative coastal cities, Accra (Ghana), Cape Town (South Africa), Mombasa (Kenya), and Tunis (Tunisia), and evaluates the role...
Mohamed Saber, Vithundwa Richard Posite, Claude Charteris Mahoungou et al.· Discover Cities· 0 citations
Reducing the harm caused by natural disasters requires an accurate, defensible assessment of where social vulnerability is concentrated. Existing social vulnerability studies rely predominantly on conventional statistical techniques, such as principal component analyses and simple additive indices, and rarely derive in...
Hsiang-Yue Chen, James J. H. Liou, Kai-Ying Chen et al.· Sustainability· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.