It is argued that AI is not a neutral pedagogical tool but a sociotechnical infrastructure embedded in corporate power, data regimes, and the broader political economy of AI, developing a Moral-AI Pedagogy Framework embedding normative transparency, structured pluralism, critical AI literacy, and assessment reform centred on justificatory reasoning.
It is concluded that effective AI governance requires institutionally grounded arrangements that ensure AI supports, rather than undermines, the educational mission of higher education.
Tian-Zi Sun, Mark Joseph D. Pastor· American Journal of Educatio...· 0 citations
The main contribution is to argue that generative AI should not be positioned as an autonomous educational subject, but as a conditional medium that supports interpretation, deliberation, and responsible practice under curricular purpose, teacher judgment, transparent rules, critical AI literacy, and institutional safe...
This conceptual paper argues that traditional technology governance models are insufficient and that leaders must develop an augmented moral compass to navigate algorithmic decision-making, data governance, and equity and proposes an original Moral Compass Model.
A policy-oriented posthuman framework for interpreting AI integration in architectural pedagogy and translating it into responsible design education principles is developed, which clarifies the theoretical relevance of posthuman pedagogy for AI-supported architectural education.
