This study maps the landscape of GPCR classification and function by translating the majority of the GPCR structures into structure graphs and analyzing over 2 million structural contacts to capture key aspects of the structural communication within the GPCR superfamily with implications in drug discovery.
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the therapeutic targets for an estimated 30–40% of marketed drugs. By translating the majority of the GPCR structures from the Protein Data Bank into structure graphs and analyzing over 2 million structural contacts, this study maps the landscape of GPCR classification and function. A minimal subset of just 30 specific contacts is sufficient to define the signatures of distinct receptor classes, subfamilies, types, subtypes, and functional states. These structural signatures successfully assigned classifications to the orphan GPCRs. Upon activation, class A GPCRs undergo the most radical network reorganization of all classes, retaining 0% of their state-specific contacts when transitioning from the inactive to the active state, a stark contrast to the 32–50% retention observed in classes B1, C, and F. Despite this complete contact turnover across the 7TM bundle, class A activation remains anchored by a highly conserved core of ten universal network nodes. Analysis of representative shortest communication pathways (metapaths) demonstrates that class A GPCRs rely on these highly conserved nodes to bridge structural communication between the orthosteric ligand-binding pocket and the intracellular G-protein-binding site, regardless of the functional state. Furthermore, these metapaths intersect directly with known allosteric binding sites for small allosteric modulators. G protein binding structurally reorganizes the receptor network, funneling a multitude of potential communication pathways into a few preferential routes. These pathways culminate at the highly conserved arginine residue of the E/DRY motif that acts as a key mediator of G-protein recognition, while structural divergences at the receptor-G protein interface dictate the distinctive pathways of specific G-protein signaling. The wide analysis was able to capture key aspects of the structural communication within the GPCR superfamily with implications in drug discovery.
This research established a 3-state model of Gαs conformational landscape and quantitatively investigated the conformational transitions and dynamics of Gαs proteins in response to different ligand-bound receptors, enabling a novel GPCR model that integrates quantitative G protein conformational dynamics at the atomic...
G protein‐coupled receptors are integral membrane proteins that mediate physiological processes by enabling cells to detect and respond to diverse stimuli by enabling cells to detect and respond to diverse stimuli.
Berkay Selçuk, Gunnar Schulte, Igor B. Zhulin et al.· British Journal of Pharmacol...· 0 citations
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are membrane proteins that act as signal transducers across cell membranes. Class B1 GPCRs, a subset of 15 receptors activated by peptide hormones, are involved in important physiological processes and diseases, making them a popular target for drug development. GPCRs are dynamic pro...
Theodore J. Nettleton, P. M. Sexton, D. Wootten et al.· Biochemical Society Transact...· 0 citations
Understanding how allosteric modulators influence protein dynamics is essential for guiding drug design. This work analyses a total of 45 μs of classical molecular dynamics simulations for four class A G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), namely the Complement C5a receptor (C5AR1), the Purinergic Receptor P2Y (P2RY1),...
S. Peter, G. Chalhoub, Peter J. McCormick et al.· Journal of Chemical Informat...· 0 citations
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are key regulators of cellular signaling and major drug targets. Although X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy have provided high-resolution receptor structures, these static snapshots capture only a fraction of the conformational states underlying GPCR function. Molecu...
Adrian García-Recio, Alejandro Peralta-García, Anna Korda et al.· Current Opinion in Structura...· 0 citations
GaMD ensemble docking improved early AM enrichment across all four targets under at least one program, and the Boltz-2 deep-learning program showed minimal sensitivity to GaMD templates and underperformed conventional docking, suggesting its affinity predictions complement rather than replace physics- and empirical-bas...
T. D. Thompson, Ying-Long Miao· bioRxiv· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.