Aug 2026· Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry· 0 citations· 37 references
Medicine
TL;DR
This review sets out the analytical validation, standardization, and quality assurance requirements that would allow a research-grade catalytic protease assay to become a laboratory-developed test or an approved in vitro diagnostic and proposes a staged minimum validation-and-reporting framework.
Abstract
Activity-based (catalytic) measurement of proteases in body fluids has emerged as a diagnostic modality distinct from antibody-based concentration measurement, supported by proof-of-concept evidence in oncologic and non-oncologic disease. In analytical chemistry terms, the open question is how to characterize and control a reaction-rate measurement made in a complex biological matrix. This review sets out the analytical validation, standardization, and quality assurance requirements that would allow a research-grade catalytic protease assay to become a laboratory-developed test or an approved in vitro diagnostic. We delimit the assay class across its reporter formats, explain why the metrological framework of clinical chemistry must be adapted for activity measurement in complex matrices, and operationalize the core analytical parameters for a kinetic, matrix-dependent readout: analytical specificity, precision, detection and quantification limits, linearity, trueness, robustness, and interference. We address the unresolved problem of defining and tracing a unit of proteolytic activity, the absence of quality control materials and external quality assessment schemes, and the regulatory pathway under current US and European frameworks. Catalytic protease measurement is analytically plausible and biologically informative but remains research-grade. Its translation depends less on new biology than on analytical validation, harmonization, quality control, and regulatory conformity. We propose a staged minimum validation-and-reporting framework, condensed into a checklist, as a starting point for the field to develop by consensus.
Validation of analytical methods is a mandatory requirement for testing laboratories accredited under ISO/IEC 17025:2017. Immune response to vaccination is inherently heterogeneous, multidimensional, and distributed along continua rather than binary outcomes. ISO/IEC 17025:2017 provides valuable principles and a struct...
Andrea Palencia-Reyes, Esmeralda Juárez, Carlos Blancas-Ruiíz et al.· Accreditation and Quality As...· 0 citations
Overall, this work establishes a metrologically characterized and transferable dPCR-based RMP for NRAS p.Q61R quantification that can support the harmonization of molecular measurements, the value assignment of RM, and the alignment of routine and secondary methods, thereby strengthening the reliability of quantitative...
Jessica Petiti, Sabrina Caria, L. Revel et al.· Methods· 0 citations
This review offers a comprehensive synthesis of bioanalytical method development, validation principles, regulatory frameworks, prevailing challenges, and emerging trends, underscoring the pivotal role of bioanalysis in contemporary drug development and personalized medicine.
M. Jadhav, D. Mali, S. Amrutkar· International Journal of Dru...· 0 citations
Monitoring anti-drug antibody (ADA) responses is critical for evaluating the safety and efficacy of protein therapeutics. While traditional three-tiered testing (screening, confirmation, titration) reliably identifies ADA incidence, onset and magnitude, modern, complex biologics necessitate adapting our assessment stra...
Gregor P Lotz, D. Sickert, R. Staack et al.· Bioanalysis· 0 citations
A consistent, precise, and cost-effective HPLC method was successfully developed and validated for Ritonavir and its related impurity and strengthens impurity risk assessment and supports the safe and effective quality control of antiviral pharmaceutical products.
Balaji Ramakrishnan, J. S, Esakkimuthukumar Mariappan et al.· International Journal of Dru...· 0 citations
BackgroundProstate-specific antigen (PSA) remains the most widely used biomarker for prostate cancer screening, diagnosis, and monitoring. However, despite decades of standardization efforts, significant inter-assay variability persists, with important consequences for clinical interpretation and decision-making.Object...
X. Filella· Tumour biology : the journal...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.