This work introduces Clifford-stabilizer simulation, an exact and efficient algorithm based on updating a Clifford-stabilizer group to simulate noisy preparation protocols for a broad class of logical magic states used to implement non-Clifford gates in the third level of the Clifford hierarchy under circuit-level Pauli errors.
Abstract
The preparation of high-fidelity logical magic states is a crucial subroutine for universal fault-tolerant quantum computation (FTQC). Predicting the performance of FTQC and developing improved protocols rely on numerical methods to classically simulate logical magic state preparation in the presence of noise. Clifford logic on Pauli-stabilizer codes with circuit-level Pauli errors can be efficiently simulated using Pauli-stabilizer formalism, but the non-Clifford operations required to prepare logical magic states render generic simulation inefficient. We introduce Clifford-stabilizer simulation, an exact and efficient algorithm based on updating a Clifford-stabilizer group to simulate noisy preparation protocols for a broad class of logical magic states used to implement non-Clifford gates in the third level of the Clifford hierarchy under circuit-level Pauli errors. Clifford-stabilizer simulation applies to a range of operations that commonly appear in preparation protocols for such logical magic states, including Pauli-stabilizer measurements, logical Clifford measurements, and transversal non-Clifford gates. Our algorithm for Clifford-stabilizer simulation maps a non-Clifford circuit with sampled circuit-level Pauli errors to a Clifford circuit that exactly reproduces its measurement outcome distribution, achieving time and space complexities polynomial in relevant protocol parameters. We perform exact simulation of magic state cultivation up to fault distance 7 by Clifford-stabilizer simulation. Our method provides a route to perform exact benchmarking of large-scale logical magic state preparation protocols required for useful FTQC.
Non-Clifford gates are essential for avoiding classical simulability under the Gottesman-Knill theorem. An error-corrected circuit with non-Clifford gates will therefore be an important element for realizing useful fault-tolerant quantum algorithms. However, accurately understanding the fault-tolerant performance of su...
Xiao Xiao, Dominik Hangleiter, J. P. Ataides et al.· 1 citation
We show that every intermediate state of a broad class of non-Clifford quantum error-correction circuits is a third-order phase-polynomial state, even under stochastic Pauli noise. The class includes magic state distillation and cultivation, code switching and gauge fixing, transversal non-Clifford gates with syndrome...
Serban-Ion Cercelescu, Mark Koch, A. Pesah· 2 citations
This work introduces a low-cost magic-state preparation protocol in which the choice of stabilizer generators is co-designed with the flag gadgets, allowing the syndrome-extraction circuit itself to filter correlated faults across a non-Clifford layer.
Useful quantum computation requires the fault-tolerant implementations of a universal gate set which are generically not efficiently simulable. We devise an algebraic framework that allows for efficient sampling from the measurement distribution of fault-tolerant circuits that implement diagonal logic gates in the thir...
J. C. Magdalena de la Fuente, T. R. Scruby· 4 citations
Non-Clifford gates are essential for universal quantum computation, yet implementing them fault-tolerantly remains a central challenge for stabilizer codes. Here, we show how a syndrome degree of freedom can mediate a logical non-Clifford gate. Releasing one stabilizer check makes an additional logical qubit available...
Kishor Bharti, Tobias Haug, Andrew Tanggara· 0 citations
Non-Clifford operations required for universal quantum computation can be implemented by measuring logical Clifford operators. We present a generalized framework to fault-tolerantly measure transversal Clifford logical operators in quantum low-density parity check (QLDPC) codes. Our protocol takes any QLDPC code and de...
Kathleen Chang, A. Lyons, Yuan-Jie Ren et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.