Aug 2026· Ijtimoiy-gumanitar sohada ilmiy-innovatsion tadqiqotlar· 0 citations
Abstract
The transition of Uzbekistan to a market economy and its integration into global economic networks have driven an intensive influx of economic terminology into the Uzbek language, predominantly from two donor languages — Russian and English. This article examines the lexical-semantic features that accompany the assimilation of such borrowed economic terms into the recipient language. Drawing on a corpus of approximately 450 economic term units compiled from lexicographic sources, specialized textbooks, normative-legal texts and contemporary economic media, the study applies descriptive-comparative, componential and definitional-contextual analysis to trace how meaning is restructured during borrowing. The findings distinguish four principal source strata — direct English borrowings, Russian-mediated internationalisms, direct Russian borrowings and calques built from native material — and identify five recurrent semantic-adaptation mechanisms: full semantic transfer, semantic narrowing, semantic widening, semantic shift and loan translation. Particular attention is given to synonymic doublets and triplets in which native, Russian and English designations compete and undergo stylistic and functional redistribution, and to the polysemy and homonymy generated by multi-channel borrowing. The results demonstrate that economic borrowing in Uzbek is not a mechanical transfer of labels but a systematic semantic reorganization governed by donor-language chronology, register and the word-formation resources of the recipient language.
The paper argues that future standardization should be evidence-based, concept-oriented, and sensitive to actual disciplinary usage, and proposes practical principles for building a stable Uzbek terminology resource for computational linguistics.
This paper is focused on the problem of overcoming macro-typological asymmetry in translating texts from Russian into Arabic and from Arabic into Russian. The paper is dedicated to a comprehensive study of the mechanisms of cross-linguistic meaning transfer in cases where direct transfer (transcoding) proves impossible...
Dawood Jaafar Al, Borisovna Kozerenko Elena· Philology. Theory & Prac...· 0 citations
Rapid intensification of English-language scientific communication highlights natural sciense discourse as the primary medium for knowledge verification and transfer. This collective monograph addresses the internal dynamics of modern science, focusing on the systemic-structural, cognitive-semantic, non-verbal, and gen...
Julia Babchuk, Kateryna Mehela, T. Myzyn et al.· 0 citations
The paper explores the adaptation of lexical borrowings through the lens of two modes of world construal: entity-based and process-based. The study focuses on English and Korean, a language pair marked by intensive contact while being rooted in distinct cultural backgrounds. The analysis draws on borrowed lexical items...
O. K. Iriskhanova, T. Mozol· Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvist...· 0 citations
. The article examines the lexico-semantic structure and translation of U.S. Navy rank titles within the NATO OF/OR framework into Polish and Ukrainian. The study is motivated by the growing importance of naval interoperability, defence terminology standardisation, and precise multilingual communication in NATO-related...
P. Hubych, Nataliia Svydnytska-Ilkiv, Nataliia Fihura· Вісник науки та освіти· 0 citations
Phraseological units determine the unique lexical narratives and linguistic identity of each language, which is a unique set of structural, functional and cultural features that distinguish one language from another, form its identity and provide its speakers with a sense of belonging to a certain community. Phraseolog...
A. Taranenko, N. Konoplenko, L. Sulima· Folia Philologica· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.