A use‐case–specific framework is developed to evaluate SA‐DCAs intended for community and primary‐care MCI screening and applied to a comprehensive scoping review of published evidence, finding only four tools met predefined framework criteria across nine eligible studies.
Abstract
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a prodromal stage of Alzheimer's disease (AD), remains undiagnosed in > 90% of individuals, delaying access to timely evaluation and interventions. Self‐administered digital cognitive assessments (SA‐DCAs) offer scalable approaches for early detection, yet their real‐world validation and clinical readiness remain uncertain. We developed a use‐case–specific framework to evaluate SA‐DCAs intended for community and primary‐care MCI screening and applied it to a comprehensive scoping review of published evidence (2012‐2025). Among 79 identified SA‐DCAs, only four tools met predefined framework criteria across nine eligible studies. Common limitations included restricted population representativeness, inconsistent diagnostic performance reporting, limited biomarker anchoring, and reliance on prefiltered cohorts. Overall, the current evidence base is methodologically heterogeneous and incomplete for clinical deployment. The proposed framework characterizes requirements including anchoring strength, prevalence‐adjusted performance reporting, and representative sampling establishing a foundation for advancing robust real‐world evidence needed to translate SA‐DCAs from research to clinical practice.
High‐frequency remote cognitive assessment is feasible, reliable, and valid in a relatively young international ADAD cohort, supporting its integration into early‐intervention studies.
A. Aschenbrenner, Hannah M. Wilks, Matthew S. Welhaf et al.· Alzheimer's & Dementia· 1 citation
Evidence‐based recommendations are intended to support clinicians, particularly in primary care, to identify MCI and plan an intervention strategy to help slow age‐related cognitive decline.
N. Kandiah, Y. Chan, D. Dasig et al.· CNS Neuroscience & Therapeut...· 0 citations
A DCA Workgroup is developed to develop expert recommendations for implementing supervised, in‐clinic DCAs within US clinical workflows that support recognition, diagnostic evaluation, and care planning across primary and specialty care.
P. Tariot, Darren R. Gitelman, Ishtar Govia et al.· Alzheimer's & Dementia· 0 citations
This systematic review evaluated longitudinal evidence on the association between MBI and incident dementia, including conversion rates, dementia subtypes, domain-specific risk patterns, and biomarker correlates, finding MBI seems to represent a clinically meaningful syndrome that identifies individuals at elevated ris...
K. L. M. Sassi, Anika Thomson, Vanessa M. Young et al.· Journal of Alzheimer's Disea...· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence approaches for early diagnosis of MCI appear promising and may support or enhance physician performance in selected settings, but widespread clinical adoption requires prospective validation, standardized physician benchmarking, and rigorous evaluation in real-world clinical environments.
Interestingly, subjective cognitive concerns assessed by the Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire were strongly associated with overall subjective symptom burden, supporting the use of brief self-report questionnaires as a pragmatic and scalable first-step stratification approach in community-based dementia detec...
Carolin I. Kurz, Nikola Clara-Sophie Wüsten, Paulina Tegethoff et al.· Scientific Reports· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.