A comprehensive review of the nonclinical and clinical immunogenicity data from nine AAV-based GTPs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency between 2017 and early 2026 offers science-based recommendations to inform the future development of GTPs.
Abstract
Adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based gene therapy has emerged as a promising approach for treating a variety of genetic disorders by delivering therapeutic genes to target tissues. There have been numerous publications reporting nonclinical assessments of immune responses to various AAV-based gene therapy products (GTPs). However, the immune response data from approved GTPs in humans have not been systematically reviewed, and the utility of the data generated in these clinical studies has not been evaluated. This manuscript is intended as a comprehensive review of the nonclinical and clinical immunogenicity data, with focus on adaptive immunity, from nine AAV-based GTPs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) between 2017 and early 2026. It also offers science-based recommendations to inform the future development of GTPs. The accumulated experience from these approved GTPs support a tailored, risk-based approach to immunogenicity monitoring: pre-existing anti-vector antibodies show limited association to clinical response and cellular immune response measurement via ELISpot have practical limitations in clinical studies. These findings advocate for simplified analytical strategies — tailored to the drug development stage and informed by nonclinical data — that incorporate clinical safety markers such as liver function tests, cardiac damage markers, and transgene protein expression as indicators of clinically meaningful immune responses.
Viral-based gene therapies and vaccines represent a rapidly evolving modality for treating a wide range of diseases. However, these novel modalities pose novel and complex challenges for translational PK/PD scientists and clinical pharmacologists during preclinical and clinical development. To support accelerated devel...
H. Mody, Jatin Narula, Prathap Nagaraja Shastri et al.· AAPS Journal· 0 citations
The human monoclonal antibody MR191N provides complete post-exposure protection in non-human primates and necessitates adaptive trial designs, expanded diagnostic models, and synergistic combination therapies to address MVD.
V. Kandi, F. Branda, Mohammed Alissa et al.· Expert Review of Anti-Infect...· 0 citations
This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current status of viral and non-viral vector systems for in vivo and ex vivo applications, and key comparisons are made across safety, efficacy, scalability, and immune responses.
Within this limited early-phase evidence base, no severe toxicities attributable to non-viral platforms were reported, and the evidence identifies knowledge gaps warranting prospective investigation.
Favio Varón Suárez, J. Moreno, Oriana Arias-Valderrama et al.· Frontiers in Immunology· 0 citations
Oncolytic Virotherapy (OVT) is an emerging area of cancer immunotherapy
that has shown promise as a therapeutic agent, leveraging genetically engineered replication-
competent viruses that kill cancer cells without harming normal cells. HSV-1 (T-VEC),
vaccinia, and adenoviruses. Immuno-Oncology Oncol Ther 2017; Mon...
Indu Arora, Shalu Attar, Priyanka Bhardwaj et al.· Clinical Cancer Drugs· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.