Aug 2026· Systems· Vol 14, pp. 985· 0 citations· 28 references
Abstract
Unexpected events have led to potential disruptions in upstream supply systems. Downstream enterprises often hold inventory to mitigate disruption risks. Previous studies have rarely focused on inventory under partial supply disruption, and responsive pricing and ordering decisions in two periods, even though this combined scenario is more applicable to real economic life. Motivated by the gap, this paper studies two-period game models of responsive pricing and ordering decisions without inventory (Model N) and with inventory (Model H), and considers partial supply disruption risks in the second period. We find that, under partial supply disruption, compared with the model without inventory (Model N), the order quantity of the model with inventory (Model H) may be either lower or higher; its retail price may also be either lower or higher. When the inventory holding cost is high, the retailer and supply chain are more inclined toward no inventory (Model N). Under certain conditions, the manufacturer supports the retailer in holding inventory. Interestingly, the expected profits of the retailer and the supply chain may increase as the disruption probability increases, and this holds true even when the inventory holding cost is very high. These findings have theoretical and practical significance for the resilience of supply chain systems.
Problem Definition: In a decentralized supply chain, the downstream retailer (he) may strategically carry inventory to induce lower future wholesale prices, triggering the upstream manufacturer (she) to raise the early-period wholesale price to deter such behavior. In the presence of cost learning, where future product...
G. Balasubramanian, Benny Mantin, Sachin Jayaswal· Manufacturing & Service...· 0 citations
Reliable emergency supply systems are particularly vulnerable when a supply interruption coincides with a surge in demand. This study examines a single-period procurement problem involving a lower-cost primary supplier that may be completely disrupted and a more reliable but higher-priced backup supplier. A joint emerg...
Information distortion and incentive misalignment often undermine supply chain performance. In response, many firms adopt a “control tower” approach, whereby one party assumes responsibility for replenishment decisions across the supply chain. Industry examples showed that this role may be assigned to the customer, Cus...
Shi Chen, Morris A. Cohen, Hau L. Lee· Management Sciences· 0 citations
Geopolitically driven disruptions have become increasingly frequent, posing risks to global supply chains. To investigate firms' disruption mitigation strategies and their interactions, we develop a two‐period game‐theoretic model in which the pre‐disruption and post‐disruption periods are explicitly separated. Withi...
Yi-Zhen Lu, Jian-Qiang Zhang· International Transactions i...· 0 citations
In practice, more operations are integrated into supply chain management to meet increasing market competition. This study is the first to examine an extensive, coordinated joint replenishment, inventory, location, and routing problem under multi-period, non-stationary stochastic demands. To model this problem, a serie...
Ju-Feng Yang, Su-Jian Li· International Journal of Ind...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.