Aug 2026· Journal of the Acoustical Society of America· Vol 159, pp. A151-A151· 0 citations
Abstract
Speech perception requires listeners to contend with highly variable acoustic input to construct stable linguistic categories. Recent work has shown that listeners differ in their categorization consistency—the degree to which categorization responses vary for the same stimuli across different trials. Crucially, differences in consistency predict a wide range of real-world outcomes, including language and reading ability in children and adults. However, the mechanisms underlying these differences remain poorly understood. Here, we evaluate the hypothesis that inconsistent categorization is driven by inconsistent encoding of the acoustic information at the neural level. Using electroencephalography, we measured the consistency of the N1 and P3 components in an oddball task. The auditory N1 captures early, pre-attentional encoding processes, while the P3 reflects higher level categorization judgements in the oddball design. Listeners heard steps along speech continua involving bilabial and velar stop consonants while EEG recording took place. We then predicted listeners’ categorization consistency at the behavioral level using the visual analog scaling task from the consistency of their neural responses. Preliminary results suggest a relationship between the consistency of the N1 and the behavioral response, bolstering the idea bottom up noise at the neural level is responsible for differences in categorization consistency.
Successful speech perception requires listeners to bin continuous acoustic information into discrete phonetic categories. However, some people maintain within-category acoustic information (gradient) while others discard category-irrelevant information (discrete) during perception. Listeners also vary in how consistent...
Rose Rizzi, Jack R. Stirn, Zara Eisenhut et al.· Neuroscience· 0 citations
In cocktail party-type environments, listeners must segregate simultaneous acoustic sources and select one for processing. Behavioral studies have established that both low-level voice differences (e.g., pitch) and high-level linguistic differences (e.g., word content) aid these processes. Electroencephalography (EEG)...
Sahil Luthra, Eric Parker, Marysia Brown et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Neural representations of acoustic features that are key to speech perception have been studied extensively within the auditory cortex (AC), but their representations in higher-order cortical regions remain poorly understood. This study investigates the cortical encoding of three acoustic features in spoken vowels to d...
Yong-Tian Ou, K. Kay, A. Oxenham· Journal of Neuroscience· 0 citations
The temporal structure of speech has traditionally been characterized by the rhythmicity of its canonical linguistic units (phonemes, syllables, words), each summarized by a mean occurrence rate. While valid, this view overlooks whether speech carries a finer, context-dependent and probabilistic temporal structure that...
Laure Deyna, Philippe Albouy, Agnès Trébuchon et al.· bioRxiv· 1 citation
ABSTRACT Listeners' brains align when they attend to the same speech, but what determines how strongly they align is not well understood. We asked whether that alignment tracks the communicative relation between a listener and a message, manipulating it from the speaker's side and from the listener's, and bounding the...
Barak Atia, Yair Berson, A. Goldstein· Psychophysiology· 0 citations
Language is often processed in perceptually challenging conditions. Although the neural correlates of speech processing in such conditions have been well studied, this is not the case for sign language. Thus, it is unknown whether the neural mechanisms involved in this process are comparable across language modalities....
Cristina Tobías Figuerola, Carine Signoret, Emil Holmer et al.· Journal of Cognitive Neurosc...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.