The results demonstrate that strategy nondominance is workload- and condition-dependent, supporting regime-aware algorithm engineering rather than a universal policy ranking.
Abstract
Coverage-selection policies that optimize the same monotone objective can occupy different quality-runtime frontiers as workload scale, budget, repetition horizon, and execution substrate change. CAGE is a regime-aware algorithm-engineering framework that holds coverage semantics fixed through a shared bitset execution substrate and studies how the nondominated strategy set changes under controlled operating conditions. We separate intrinsic workload descriptors from measured strategy response, represent each condition by its empirical Pareto set, and identify regime transitions from changes in Pareto membership or statistically supported crossovers. Across Defects4J, Epinions, a BWSN-inspired time-to-detection workload, repeated selection, and an embedded RV32 realization, we observe distinct transitions. At a 5% budget, one-exchange refinement adds 27 Chart lines at 11.3x baseline median runtime, whereas deeper search adds five Time lines at roughly 715x. On Math, CP-SAT confirms full-universe optimality at 20% and 40% and residual lower-budget headroom. Persistent preprocessing reuse first achieves confidence-interval-supported speedup at horizon 20 and reaches 1.442x at horizon 100. ModelSim shows a separate bitset-width crossover. The results demonstrate that strategy nondominance is workload- and condition-dependent, supporting regime-aware algorithm engineering rather than a universal policy ranking.
PRISM, a prediction-guided runtime framework that jointly selects model variants and CPU allocations for containerized edge microservices, and adapts each pipeline stage in place and minimizes predicted CPU-package energy under deadline, resource, and offline model-level Quality of Result constraints is presented.
Uwe Gropengießer, Thomas Reuter, Dominik Schön et al.· 0 citations
Parallel and distributed HPO systems evaluate many configurations concurrently, but their throughput depends heavily on when a scheduler stops weak trials and reallocates scarce CPUs, GPUs, and memory. Existing systems commonly rank live trials by validation loss, treating the early-stop metric as an implementation det...
Jia-Wei Guan· Workshop Proceedings of the...· 0 citations
ContinuumBench is presented, a benchmark that controls workload, connectivity, and calibration assumptions and metrics over completed tasks hide unfinished work in cloud-edge controllers and compares placement-only and scale-capable controllers under declared regimes and stressors.
Lan-Pei Li, Antonino Vaccarella, Vincenzo Lomonaco et al.· 0 citations
A cost, quality, and latency Pareto atlas is built to identify the best configurations for different deployment constraints and shows why speed alone is insufficient in vLLM inference, showing why speed alone is insufficient.
Srikanta Datta Tumkur, Jay Iyer, Mehar Simhadri et al.· 0 citations
Online OS tuning can improve long-running services, but existing tuners are not well suited for live hosts. They treat scheduler, power, memory, and I/O controls as black-box variables and optimize a scalar reward. This approach ignores cross-knob policy structure, breaks down when application metrics are unavailable,...
Georgios Liargkovas, M. Joshi, Hubertus Franke et al.· Proceedings of the ACM SIGOP...· 0 citations
The deployment-fidelity gap G(R) is defined as the difference between partition-level and deployable end-to-end utility and derive two accounting consequences: a per-instance margin-regret stability condition that tells us when a partition-time family choice is deployment-optimal, and a sharp partition-only identificat...
Jiacheng Zhang, Yu Tang, Li Zhu· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.