Sep 2026· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence· 0 citations· 65 references
TL;DR
This survey examines how these methods integrate graphs into various stages of the LLM pipeline, including the input, model, and output phases, and outlines the challenges and future research directions for developing more efficient and interpretable solutions.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in natural language processing (NLP) tasks. However, they suffer from inherent limitations due to their sequence-based nature, such as structural information loss and factual unreliability. Graphs, with the ability to explicitly model entities and relations, offer an effective way to address these shortcomings. To systematically synthesize the emerging research on graph-enhanced LLMs, this survey, Graph4LLM, examines how these methods integrate graphs into various stages of the LLM pipeline, including the input, model, and output phases. For each phase, we provide a detailed review of the key methods and techniques. We also introduce a wide range of application scenarios where Graph4LLM methods demonstrate significant potential. Finally, we outline the challenges and future research directions for developing more efficient and interpretable solutions.
This work presents the first systematic study of inverse relation directionality in LLMs, using a benchmark consisting of 5,457 instances spanning 27 distinct inverse relation labels and reveals systematic asymmetries in inverse relation classification across LLMs.
A novel self-supervised framework for relational reasoning over RDBs that treats context sparsity as a controllable curriculum variable and leverages it to induce a progressive shift from semantic-dominant inference to structure-aware relational reasoning.
Yujie Tian, Kun Zhang, Qiu-Yuan Li et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
A large-scale benchmark with 60\sim 90× more queries than prior work, built on 3× more databases, an automated pipeline that can execute existing methods without manual intervention, and multi-dimensional, fine-grained evaluation metrics for comprehensive assessment.
Bo Li, Chenzhan Wang, Long-Kang Lin et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
This survey presents a systematic review of 121 references spanning 2002 to 2026, tracing the evolution of TextRank-based approaches into hybrid LLM pipelines and advancing three qualified arguments.
Ahmed J. Jabur, Asmaa Abdul Azeez Dakhil, Israa Saad Mohammed et al.· Iraqi Journal for Computers...· 0 citations
The potential of LLMs to support and enhance systematic literature searches in scientific research is described and practical and ethical challenges are addressed, particularly those concerning scientific integrity, transparency, and transparency.
This tutorial provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of LLM mechanism discovery, validation, and editing, and surveys mechanistic editing techniques that leverage MI insights to modify behavior at varying granularity.
Yin-Han He, Wendy Zheng, Tianyi Zhao et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.