The OSOS database establishes a rigorous standard to guide the development and validation of next-generation density functionals and machine-learning potentials for doublet radicals.
Abstract
We present the Open-Shell Organic Systems (OSOS) database, a diverse benchmark set comprising 9934 atomization, isomerization, and H-abstraction energies computed at the CCSD(T)/CBS limit via W1-F12 theory. Historically, large-scale data sets (e.g., QM9 and ANI-1x) have been heavily biased toward closed-shell species. The OSOS database addresses this gap by providing a diverse and accurate set of reaction energies dedicated exclusively to organic doublet radical systems for benchmarking and training purposes. The data set covers the chemical space spanned by localized and delocalized organic radicals containing up to seven non-hydrogen atoms (C, N, O, and F). The database consists of 3360 radical total atomization energies, 3360 H-abstractions, 2292 H-shifts, and 922 constitutional isomerizations. We use this database to assess the performance of density functional theory (DFT). We find that most density functionals systematically overestimate radical atomization energies; therefore, the inclusion of dispersion corrections generally leads to a deterioration in performance. Furthermore, delocalized radicals present a significantly greater challenge for most DFT methods than localized species, leading to larger overestimations of their atomization energies. For localized radicals, errors increase in the order: O-centered < C-centered < N-centered. Remarkably, the deep-learning meta-GGA Skala functional demonstrates exceptional accuracy, significantly outperforming conventional functionals across all rungs of Jacob’s Ladder and consistently achieving mean absolute deviations below 1 kcal mol–1 for the abstraction, shift, and isomerization reactions. The OSOS database establishes a rigorous standard to guide the development and validation of next-generation density functionals and machine-learning potentials for doublet radicals.
Foundation machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) deliver near-ab-initio accuracy at a fraction of the computational cost, yet their promise for Metal-organic Frameworks (MOFs) remains largely unrealized as large unit cells make first-principles training data expensive to generate, fine-tuned models are scarce...
T. J. Inizan, Prathami Divakar Kamath, Alin M. Elena et al.· 0 citations
The GFN2-xTB semiempirical method performed better than all tested uMLIPs, proving the need for more off-equilibrium data in the parametrization of uMLIPs, where OMOL-1k-MD can be of high use.
Maximilian Bechtel, J. Steffen· npj Computational Materials· 0 citations
In the focal-point estimation of the coupled cluster with singles, doubles, and perturbative triples [CCSD(T)] interaction energies followed by extrapolation to the complete basis set (CBS) limit, the most critical and challenging step is the rapid and accurate calculation of the coupled-cluster correction term, δMP2CC...
T. Sun, Wei-Zhou Wang, Yi-Bo Wang· Journal of Chemical Physics· 0 citations
Coupled-cluster theory defines the accuracy standard for molecular electronic-structure properties but scales too steeply for routine application, whereas density-functional theory is affordable yet systematically biased. We resolve this trade-off with a single equivariant network, HARP (Hamiltonian Read-out for Proper...
High-level quantum chemical methods (MRCI+Q and MRCI+P) combined with large correlation-consistent basis sets (aug-cc-pVnZ, where n = Q, 5, 6), were used to investigate the ground-state potential energy curves (PECs) and surfaces (PESs) of the X2, XO, and X2O systems (with X = F, Cl, Br). For the triatomic systems, the...
Imen Selmi, M. Bejaoui, J. Dhiflaoui et al.· Molecules· 0 citations
Efficient scalable implementations are presented for two single-reference coupled-cluster (CC) methods with non-iterative corrections for triple excitations, which accurately describe single bond dissociations in molecules in contrast to the standard CCSD(T) approach. These methods are (a) the completely renormalized c...
D. Datta, M. Gordon· Journal of Chemical Physics· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.