Skip to content
Review Open access

Coupled Geomechanical and Geochemical Responses of Carbonate-Bearing Sandstone Reservoirs to CO₂ Injection: A Critical Review of Instability Mechanisms, Risk-Assessment Frameworks, and Implications for Energy Storage

2026 · International journal of research and innovation in applied science · 0 citations

Abstract

The safe and permanent geological storage of carbon dioxide (CO₂) in deep carbonate-bearing sandstone formations requires a rigorous understanding of the coupled geomechanical and geochemical responses of the host reservoir to sustained fluid injection. Fluid injection simultaneously raises pore pressure, reduces effective stress on pre-existing faults, triggers carbonate mineral dissolution under acidic CO₂-saturated brine, and drives heterogeneous permeability evolution, a set of interdependent processes whose combined effect on reservoir integrity, cap-rock seal security, and induced seismicity risk is not adequately captured by existing single-process risk assessment frameworks. This comprehensive review synthesizes 96 peer-reviewed studies published between 1980 and 2024 to characterize the mechanistic basis and field-scale consequences of these coupled responses in carbonate-bearing sandstones. We examine: (i) the theoretical framework linking pore pressure increase, Biot effective stress reduction, and Coulomb failure on critically stressed faults; (ii) the geochemistry of carbonate dissolution under CO₂-acidified brine, including reaction kinetics, dissolution regimes, and their dependence on mineralogical composition; (iii) the coupled evolution of permeability anisotropy under combined mechanical and chemical loading; (iv) the mechanisms of cap-rock integrity failure including hydraulic fracturing, fault reactivation, capillary leakage, and wellbore cement degradation; (v) quantitative evidence from active geological carbon storage (GCS) sites including Sleipner, In Salah, Decatur, and Otway; and (vi) the limitations of current continuum-scale risk assessment practice. We identify four critical gaps in the literature and propose a six-phase integrated geomechanical-geochemical risk assessment framework for GCS operations in carbonate-bearing formations. The framework directly addresses the systematic underestimation of geomechanical instability risk arising from the failure to couple dissolution-driven permeability evolution with mechanical stability analysis in current engineering practice.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.