Skip to content
Review Open access

Orchestrating AI-based circular business models through platform ecosystems: Review, framework, and future directions.

Jul 2026 · Journal of Environmental Management · Vol 413, pp. 130341 · 0 citations · 121 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The findings show that AI-CBM transitions unfold through recursive cycles of experimentation, validation, and recalibration, as developments in one dimension expose misalignments in data maturity, governance arrangements, and ecosystem coordination.

Abstract

Prior research has examined isolated aspects of artificial intelligence (AI) and circular business models (CBMs), including lifecycle optimization, stakeholder collaboration, and AI-enabled offerings. However, the literature remains fragmented and provides limited understanding of how AI reshapes circular value creation, governance, and coordination across platform ecosystems. Addressing this gap, we conduct a systematic literature review of 88 peer-reviewed articles and apply thematic analysis to develop an integrative, process-oriented framework. The analysis identifies three interdependent dimensions of AI-CBM transition: strategic reframing, AI-driven dematerialization, and ecosystem platformization, alongside socio-technical tensions that emerge through barriers, ethical and interpretive challenges, and strategic trade-offs. The findings show that AI-CBM transitions unfold through recursive cycles of experimentation, validation, and recalibration, as developments in one dimension expose misalignments in data maturity, governance arrangements, and ecosystem coordination. The framework further distinguishes when AI remains a peripheral enabler, becomes constitutive of circular value logic, or operates as ecosystem-structuring infrastructure. Conceptually, the study explains how AI reorganizes the specification, evaluation, and coordination of circular value through data-driven routines and platform infrastructures. Practically, the study develops decision heuristics and readiness conditions related to data maturity, ecosystem alignment, governance, participation, and value distribution. The study frames AI-CBM transition as a movement across socio-technical configurations that vary in structural dependence on AI and require ongoing alignment among strategic intent, technological capability, and ecosystem coordination.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

Orchestration Theory of the Multinational Enterprise in Digital Platform and AI Ecosystems

It is argued that modern MNEs are best viewed not simply as organizations that internalize transactions, but as focal firms that orchestrate globally distributed systems of resources, capabilities, partners, and complementary assets.

David J. Teece, Christos N. Pitelis · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Artificial Intelligence Strategic Lifecycle: A Literature Review-Based Framework

By integrating five theoretical perspectives, the review develops a model of the AI strategic lifecycle, offering both a consolidated foundation for future research and a forwardlooking agenda for managers seeking to leverage AI as a strategic asset.

J. Lambert, O. Garanina · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Bright sides and governance costs of GenAI in business processes: insights from a multi-case study analysis

The study conceptualises governance tensions in GenAI adoption as inherent paradoxes arising from the same mechanisms that create value, and proposes the Assure-Account-Align routine as a candidate bridge between contextual conditions (TOE) and dynamic action (DC), offering a sensitising device for future research rath...

Ginevra Degregori, Davide Calandra, P. Biancone · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

What Makes A Business Ecosystem Circular? A Multilevel Review

Drawing on multilevel and complexity theories, this research identifies new and reframed core principles of circular business ecosystems (CBEs), thereby clarifying what makes a business ecosystem circular. Although CBEs are increasingly recognised as adaptive systems shaped by interdependencies and non‐linear interac...

Irene Bubbola, C. Battistella, Giovanna Attanasio · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Rethinking the future

The HCSAIGF contributes to AI governance research by providing an integrated explanatory architecture and offers a conceptual basis for future empirical research and more coherent governance practices.

Emre İmamoğlu · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.