Aug 2026· Journal of Intelligent Decision Making and Information Science· 0 citations· 26 references
TL;DR
The findings indicate that access to and use of AI tools do not necessarily develop alongside confidence, meaningful engagement, and ethical understanding, and the need for AI literacy initiatives that combine practical skills with critical evaluation, appropriate disclosure, verification of generated information, and student accountability in AI-assisted academic work.
Abstract
This study examined university students’ use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in relation to engagement, confidence, ethical awareness, and perceived academic value. A descriptive-quantitative, cross-sectional design was employed, involving 380 students from 11 colleges of a Philippine state university. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Students reported using AI-assisted applications primarily for research, summarization, writing, and editing, with ChatGPT, QuillBot, and Grammarly among the most frequently reported tools. Confidence in independent AI use was concentrated in the moderate and lower categories, while perceptions of AI-supported engagement were neutral overall. Ethical awareness was uneven: students showed stronger recognition of familiar concerns involving copyright and unethical academic use but greater uncertainty regarding the broader meaning of ethical AI use in education. Taken together, the findings indicate that access to and use of AI tools do not necessarily develop alongside confidence, meaningful engagement, and ethical understanding. The study highlights the need for AI literacy initiatives that combine practical skills with critical evaluation, appropriate disclosure, verification of generated information, and student accountability in AI-assisted academic work.
The findings suggest that while students possess foundational knowledge and ethical awareness regarding GenAI use, gaps remain in translating awareness into consistently responsible practices, which underscores the need for comprehensive AI literacy programs, explicit institutional guidelines, and ethics-focused educat...
Christianne Mae R. Rivas, Mardie E. Bucjan· International journal of res...· 0 citations
The study highlights the importance of integrating AI into ESP instruction through pedagogically sound practices supported by ethical guidance and digital literacy by providing context-specific insights that can inform the design of responsible, effective, and ethically grounded AI-enhanced ESP instruction.
D. Zulaiha, Yunika Triana· Journal of Educational Manag...· 0 citations
Perceptions of 80 first-year college students regarding the use of artificial intelligence as a learning tool in Purposive Communication revealed that students generally viewed artificial intelligence as a supportive academic resource that enhanced productivity and facilitated clearer expression of ideas.
Jefferson J. Acala· Asian Journal of Education a...· 0 citations
The preliminary findings suggest that Generative artificial intelligence use in engineering education requires attention not only to tool access or technical performance, but also to students’ interaction strategies, verification practices, and ethical evaluation of context-specific uses.
Ascensión López-Vargas, Javier Rodríguez-Vidal, Ángel García-Beltrán et al.· Education and Information Te...· 0 citations
The findings revealed a general agreement among students regarding the positive role of AI in enhancing learning experiences, increasing assignment efficiency, and developing skills relevant to future careers, however, lower mean scores in areas such as reliance on AI for research and collaboration suggest a need for f...
J. L. Galang, A. T. Capinding, Rosalie A. Pineda· TEM Journal· 0 citations
Examining undergraduate students’ ethical judgment regarding GenAI use in educational contexts and its relationship to AI literacy and student demographics highlights the need to prospectively evaluate how AI literacy instruction and ethics education may support undergraduate students’ preparation for future profession...
J. Reed, R. Ferdig, T. Dodson et al.· Journal of Academic Ethics· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.