Skip to content

MELD: Multi-Task Equilibrated Learning Detector for AI-Generated Text

May 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2605.06903 · 1 citation · 80 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

MELD (Multi-Task Equilibrated Learning Detector), which instead trains on class-balanced, family-specific AI-versus-human tasks while sharing a common representation of human writing, and its prediction scores remain stable through 2022 and increase from 2023 onward, coinciding with the widespread adoption of LLM-based writing tools.

Abstract

Large language models are widely used in everyday writing, making reliable AI-generated text detection crucial for academic integrity, content moderation, and provenance tracking. Yet high AUROC on clean, in-distribution benchmarks is not sufficient. Practical detectors must resist adversarial rewrites, generalize to unseen generators and writing domains, and maintain low false-positive rates (FPR). A pooled AI-versus-human objective does not explicitly require the model to distinguish among generator families, so it may fail to learn the generator-specific structure needed for generalization and attribution. We introduce MELD (Multi-Task Equilibrated Learning Detector), which instead trains on class-balanced, family-specific AI-versus-human tasks while sharing a common representation of human writing. MELD produces detection, generator-family, rewrite-task, and token-level predictions in a single forward pass. Format normalization further makes its scores invariant to the modeled reformatting operations. MELD ranks first among open-source submissions in the public RAID leaderboard and matches or exceeds supervised baselines on five of six held-out evaluation pools. To evaluate transfer to unseen generators, we introduce MELD-eval, a held-out test pool built from four frontier chat models. Without further fine-tuning, MELD achieves 99.7% TPR at 1% FPR on MELD-eval and 98% TPR at the same FPR on a held-out generator whose family is absent from training. Finally, in a case study of 5.9 million scientific texts from 2016--2026, MELD's prediction scores remain stable through 2022 and increase from 2023 onward, coinciding with the widespread adoption of LLM-based writing tools. The model, MELD-eval pool, source code, and live demo are available.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 727 citations · ⚡54
#computer vision Open access Jul 2017

What happens when software developers are (un)happy

Consequences of happiness and unhappiness that are beneficial and detrimental for developers' mental well-being, the software development process, and the produced artifacts are found.

D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al. · 236 citations · ⚡13
#computer vision Open access Oct 2004

Mobile-D: an agile approach for mobile application development

The Mobile-D approach is briefly outlined here and the experiences gained from four case studies are discussed, which helped develop an agile development approach for mobile application development.

P. Abrahamsson, Antti Hanhineva, H. Hulkko et al. · 225 citations · ⚡18
#computer vision Open access Mar 2014

Happy software developers solve problems better: psychological measurements in empirical software engineering

A study with 42 participants investigates the relationship between the affective states, creativity, and analytical problem-solving skills of software developers and offers support for the claim that happy developers are indeed better problem solvers in terms of their analytical abilities.

D. Graziotin, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 216 citations · ⚡13
#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.