These preliminary workforce signals support staged curricular development while requiring larger prospective and stakeholder-validated studies, and distinguishes these AI-specific capabilities from the pharmacotherapy, medication-safety, evidence-appraisal, and quantitative expertise required to exercise them safely.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is entering medication-use and drug-development workflows, but the AI-specific capabilities needed for pharmacist workforce readiness remain poorly characterized. This pilot environmental scan and qualitative content analysis examined publicly accessible United States employment advertisements covering 1 January 2023 through 10 August 2026. Thirty-four distinct candidate requisitions were audited; 31 met operational criteria. Ten explicitly required AI-related work and formed the primary analytic sample, while 21 AI-enabling informatics, electronic-health-record, automation, analytics, and clinical-decision-support roles were retained as contextual comparators. AI-explicit employers sought pharmacists or PharmD-eligible professionals to evaluate model-generated clinical content, correct unsafe reasoning, construct prompts and cases, curate datasets and reference answers, verify claims, apply structured evaluation frameworks, validate dosing and pharmacokinetic reasoning, provide iterative model feedback, and implement AI-enabled clinical-pharmacology use cases. These activities were synthesized into five AI workforce-readiness competencies: AI-output evaluation and validation; AI systems and workflow literacy; prompt and evaluation-task design; AI performance assessment and improvement; and responsible AI implementation and governance. The framework distinguishes these AI-specific capabilities from the pharmacotherapy, medication-safety, evidence-appraisal, and quantitative expertise required to exercise them safely. These preliminary workforce signals support staged curricular development while requiring larger prospective and stakeholder-validated studies.
It is demonstrated that most health care organizations already deploy production-level AI through EHRs, including ambient documentation, clinical decision support, predictive analytics, chart summarization, documentation integrity tools, and patient-facing AI portals, and it is concluded that workforce education consti...
Mari F. Tietze, Alaina Tellson, Ann Varghese et al.· Nursing Administration Quart...· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) is changing how health data are generated, curated, analysed, exchanged, and used for decisions. In Nigeria, Health Information Management professionals occupy a strategic position between clinical practice, administration, technology, regulation, and public health, yet longstanding digital...
Yusuf Popoola· The Eurasia Proceedings of H...· 0 citations
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into emergency department workflows has outpaced clinician training, vendor evaluation infrastructure, and specialty-wide governance. Emergency physicians increasingly encounter AI tools spanning triage, imaging, clinical decision support, documentation, and operati...
D. Dash, Joyce Macalalad, Donald L. Lum et al.· Journal of the American Coll...· 0 citations
Shared decision-making (SDM) operationalizes respect for patient autonomy, yet
health professions education often evaluates it solely through self-reported
confidence. This scoping review synthesized how artificial intelligence (AI) is
used to teach, assess, or support SDM competency among clinical trainees and
pra...
Junhewk Kim· Korean Journal of Medical Et...· 0 citations
Current evidence suggests that AI has considerable potential to support nursing workforce management; however, empirical evidence regarding implementation effectiveness remains limited.
R. Rezapour-Nasrabad, Sina Nasrollahi-Nasrabad· Journal of Nursing Managemen...· 0 citations
A targeted evidence synthesis and framework mapping exercise drawing on review-level evidence, scientific databases and regulatory sources found that a codesigned worksheet approach can support proportionate evidence capture and iterative risk management while remaining adaptable across use cases and maturity levels.
Tahmina Zebin, Jin-Yang Wu, F. Colecchia et al.· BMJ Innovations· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.