Aug 2026· Journal of Orange Technology· Vol 3, pp. 25-36· 0 citations· 30 references
TL;DR
A Humanizing Data Science Framework demonstrates that combining tech nical capabilities with human knowledge supports transparent, fair, accountable, trustworthy, and human-centered AI, providing valuable practical and theoretical guidance for researchers, practitioners, organizations, policymakers, and future interdisciplinary innovation initiatives worldwide.
Abstract
The rapid adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has transformed data-driven decision making across healthcare, finance, education, and public services. De spite these advances, AI systems continue to face challenges related to algorithmic bias, limited contextual understanding, insufficient transparency, and declining user trust, highlighting the need to integrate human expertise throughout the data science process. This study aims to systematically examine the role of domain expertise in Humanizing Data Science for the development of Ethical and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Peer-reviewed studies published be tween 2021 & 2026 were identified, screened using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and analyzed through thematic synthesis. The review identifies five major themes, namely Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, Domain Expertise Integration, Ethical and Trustworthy AI, Explainability and Human Oversight, and Humanizing Data Science. Based on these findings, this study proposes a Humanizing Data Science Framework integrating domain expertise throughout the AI lifecycle. The framework demonstrates that combining tech nical capabilities with human knowledge supports transparent, fair, accountable, trustworthy, and human-centered AI, providing valuable practical and theoretical guidance for researchers, practitioners, organizations, policymakers, and future interdisciplinary innovation initiatives worldwide.
The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and data science technologies has transformed organizational decision-making across healthcare, finance, and digital services. Despite these advancements, the increasing use of personal data has intensified concerns regarding privacy, transparency, ac countability,...
N. Santoso, Dewi Khairani, S. Masruroh et al.· Journal of Orange Technology· 0 citations
A review examines how free full-text PubMed literature describes the real-world implementation of AI in healthcare and identifies the technical, organizational, ethical, and social conditions that shape adoption.
Jagoda Pałubska, Oliwer Műller, Zuzanna Rafałowska et al.· International Journal of Inn...· 0 citations
The evidence shows strong convergence around fairness, transparency, privacy, accountability, human oversight, safety and inclusiveness, but weaker agreement on implementation, and an integrated framework for developing, deploying and monitoring AI systems in ways that are lawful, transparent, accountable, inclusive an...
Sunday Olusola Ladipo, Ifaka Queen Inazu· Direct Research Journal of E...· 0 citations
This scoping review examined the ethical and regulatory issues surrounding AI-enabled SaMD across jurisdictions and across the product lifecycle, drawing together peer-reviewed literature, standards, and official guidance.
Shaharyar Ahsan, Vivian Annastasia Chinyem Obi, Danish Noor et al.· Clinical Therapeutics· 0 citations
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in research and scientific publishing, improving efficiency. However, it raises ethical concerns regarding scientific integrity, authorship, and originality. This study aimed to identify the main ethical challenges of AI use in research publishing and to exp...
Sara Dakhesh, S. Khademizadeh, Rasha Atlasi et al.· International Journal of Hea...· 0 citations
A review of recent literature exploring AI capabilities and ethics and their relationship with organizational trust identifies gaps in current literature and suggests a future research agenda including multilevel trust, industry differences in AI and ethical considerations, and measurement of responsible AI.
Fajer Danish, Muneera Alkhalifa· Journal International Review...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.