Aug 2026· Data mining and knowledge discovery· Vol 40· 0 citations· 57 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
These models combine the periodic splitting strategy of Hoeffding Trees, which fosters ensemble diversity, with adaptive splitting mechanisms that employ change detection algorithms to identify performance decay and determine split points.
Abstract
Ensembles of decision trees are well-established methods for data stream classification. In ensemble learning, Hoeffding Trees are widely adopted as base learners, performing periodic split attempts according to the Hoeffding bound. Recent studies, however, indicate that this standard splitting mechanism lacks adaptability, while adaptive trees that trigger splits in response to performance degradation have achieved superior results. In this paper, we identify limitations in the use of adaptive-splitting decision trees as ensemble base learners, showing that change detectors often fail to promote sufficient diversity within ensembles. To address this issue, we propose two novel decision tree models, termed Hoeffding Adaptive Splitting Trees. These models combine the periodic splitting strategy of Hoeffding Trees, which fosters ensemble diversity, with adaptive splitting mechanisms that employ change detection algorithms to identify performance decay and determine split points. Experimental results demonstrate that Hoeffding Adaptive Splitting Trees enhance ensemble performance and achieve state-of-the-art results across a comprehensive evaluation, including benchmark comparisons, computational cost analysis, and concept drift adaptation.
Data-Informed Centroid Splitting (DICS), a clustering-based framework that constructs a compact and informative set of candidate splits using data-driven priors, significantly reduces the split search space for classification tasks while preserving predictive performance.
Classification and regression trees are typically constructed using a greedy splitting rule that maximizes the immediate reduction in prediction error at each node. Although this strategy is computationally efficient, it can miss splits that yield small short-term gains but create substantial downstream improvements af...
Andrew Gao, Tian-Li Liu, Rui-Chen Han et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes the Multi-Branch Neural Decision Tree with Adaptive Pruning (MBNDT), a single axis-aligned tree trained end-to-end with differentiable multi-way splits that achieves the best average rank and mean balanced accuracy among depth-constrained single-tree baselines.
H. Park, Jeonghoon Choi, Juseong Kim et al.· 0 citations
The proliferation of high-dimensional data in genomics, text analytics, hyperspectral imaging and industrial sensing has exposed a persistent weakness of conventional classifiers: as the number of features grows far beyond the number of available samples, distance measures lose contrast, decision boundaries become unst...
Porwal Rabins· International Journal of Inn...· 0 citations
Double descent is commonly studied by scaling an explicit capacity parameter, such as neural-network width. For gradient boosting decision trees (GBDTs), however, an analogous single-axis capacity parameter has not been established. We propose the number of split candidates as an operational capacity parameter for GBDT...
Ryuichi Kanoh· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.