Skip to content
Preprint

Improving Interoperability among Defence and National Security Ontologies: Analysis and Evaluation Tasks

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 62 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work analyses and document over 60 publicly available ontologies and introduces a new track for the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI), which comprises eight matching tasks, consensus alignments and manually-curated (silver-standard) mappings.

Abstract

The use of ontologies and knowledge graphs is becoming increasingly widespread in the defence and national security domain. Numerous ontologies have been developed through initiatives led by academia, industry, and government. Achieving interoperability across diverse defence and national security ontologies remains a major challenge due to the domain's breadth and specialisation. In this work, we analyse and document over 60 publicly available ontologies and introduce a new track for the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI). This track comprises eight matching tasks, consensus alignments and manually-curated (silver-standard) mappings. The consensus alignments are derived by aggregating the outputs of several state-of-the-art ontology alignment systems. The silver-standard is obtained from the manual validation of the consensus alignment together with a subset of the unique mappings (i.e., mappings suggested by only one system).

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Consistency Is Not Coherence: Orientation Search for Certified Alignments Between 4D Defence Upper Ontologies

We align three upper ontologies that sit under UK and NATO defence data infrastructure: the Information Exchange Standard (IES), the Higher Quality Data Model (HQDM) that underpins the National Digital Twin, and Basic Formal Ontology (BFO). No public alignment between IES and HQDM existed. Promoting a hand-curated 17-c...

F. Rovai · 0 citations
Open access 2026

A Framework for the Systematic Assessment of LLM-Based Ontology Learning in Mobile Networks

The increasing adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-native mobile networks has created a growing demand for scalable ontology engineering to support semantic interoperability, knowledge bases, semantically enriched data repositories, and automated reasoning for autonomous network management. Although Ontology Learn...

T. Saraiva, M. Sousa, Luis Miguel Mata et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

A Machine-Readable Approach to Automated ISO/IEC 27001 Measure Extraction and Verification

Organisations rely on ISO/IEC 27001 to structure information security management, yet controls and Privacy by Design guidance are typically documented in heterogeneous, unstructured forms that impede cross-framework comparability. Existing taxonomies and ontologies are predominantly manual, static, and do not support a...

Mevre Tunca, Ann-Jacqueline Kaldjob, Laura Porbadnik et al. · 0 citations
Oct 2026

Enriching the EuSO ontology through GenAI-based terminological selection and conceptualisation

In academic and institutional contexts, the management and structuring of specialised knowledge are essential to support effective communication and internationalisation. Traditionally, ontology development and ontology-driven terminology work have relied on expert-based manual processes and corpus analysis techni...

Helena Ortiz-Garduño, Esther Castillo-Pérez · 0 citations
Open access Jun 2026

Programmatic access to ICTV virus taxonomy through a public ontology API

The International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) is responsible for developing and maintaining a universal virus taxonomy. As the reference framework for organising the viral world, it is essential for virology and related fields. Despite its widespread use in research and public health, programmatic access to...

P. Lieutaud, J. McLaughlin, R. Hendrickson et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.