Aug 2026· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Abstract
Reinforcement learning---learning what to do from reward and punishment rather than from instruction---unifies animal psychology, optimal control, and machine learning into one computational program, and its deep-learning era delivered the field's most visible artificial intelligence achievements. This article presents a narrative review of the canonical line: Thorndike's 1911 law of effect, Bellman's 1957 dynamic programming, Samuel's 1959 checkers player, Sutton's 1988 temporal-difference learning, Watkins and Dayan's 1992 Q-learning, Tesauro's 1995 TD-Gammon, Sutton and Barto's 1998 synthesis, Mnih and colleagues' 2015 Deep Q-Network, Silver and colleagues' 2016 AlphaGo and 2017 AlphaGo Zero, Lillicrap and colleagues' continuous control with DDPG, and Schulman and colleagues' 2017 proximal policy optimization. The synthesis is organized around three themes: foundations, in which the credit-assignment problem received formal solutions in value functions and temporal difference; scaling, in which function approximation, experience replay, and self-play converted tabular theory into high-dimensional control; and algorithmic consolidation, in which actor-critic methods and policy gradients stabilized practice. It is concluded that reinforcement learning's contribution is a general grammar of goal-directed learning---and that its open problems, sample efficiency and reward specification, define the frontier between artificial and natural intelligence.
Model-based life-cycle evaluation indicates that AI-optimized PPP contracts reduce bridges reaching emergency condition by 30%–40% over a 30-year horizon while lowering life-cycle costs by 8%–12% compared with rule-based policies, providing infrastructure agencies and private concessionaires with an integrated AI-driven life-cycle management platform.
Ali Shehadeh, Odey Alshboul· Journal of Legal Affairs and...· 0 citations
Abstract The rapid development of artificial intelligence has significantly increased the availability of information, analytical capability, and machine-assisted reasoning. However, greater access to information does not necessarily produce better decisions. In many organizational contexts, the emerging bottleneck is no longer information acquisition, but the human and organizational capacity to determine what information is sufficient, when analysis should stop, when a decision should be made, and how outcomes should improve future judgment. This Foundational Note introduces Decision Intelligence Architecture (DIArc) as an architectural framework for Human–AI collaborative decision systems. DIArc is based on a central proposition: in the AI era, competitive advantage increasingly depends not on maximizing information, but on maximizing the rate at which high-quality decisions generate learning and improve judgment, under explicit constraints on information consumption and decision cycles. The architecture is organized into four theoretical layers. First, the Capability Inversion Hypothesis describes a structural shift in which information, knowledge, and analysis become increasingly abundant while judgment, commitment, execution, and learning become comparatively scarce capabilities. Second, Identity-driven Information Consumption (IDIC) describes a decision failure mechanism in which continued information consumption may serve identity reinforcement rather than decision improvement. Third, the Decision Constraint Architecture, comprising Decision Information Budget (DIB) and Decision Cycle Budget (DCB), introduces explicit constraints on information consumption and analytical iteration. Fourth, High-quality Decision Velocity (HQDV) describes the performance objective of accelerating completed high-quality decision loops, while Judgment Evolution Rate (JER) represents the longer-term evolutionary objective of improving judgment through outcome-based learning. This note constitutes the initial public disclosure of the DIArc architecture and establishes its theoretical baseline for subsequent research and branch concepts.
Lucas Xiaochun Xu· Zenodo (CERN European Organi...· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduAug 27, 2026
A new machine-learning framework aims to improve the success rate of computational protein design while moving away from results that reproduce sequences found in nature.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduAug 24, 2026
A new method for surgically removing training examples from a model reveals that as datasets grow, the link between what a model learns and what it produces dissolves.