Sep 2026· Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems: Applications in Engineering and Technology· 0 citations· 10 references
TL;DR
The obtained results indicate that the proposed framework provides more adaptive, stable, and explainable decision behavior compared to traditional static decision-making approaches.
Abstract
In modern business environments, strategic planning decisions are often made under uncertainty, incomplete information, and subjective expert evaluations. Traditional decision support systems mainly focus on the performance indicators of alternatives and generally do not explicitly incorporate the reliability of expert assessments as a dynamic component of the decision process. As a result, the stability, robustness, and explainability of strategic decisions may decrease in uncertain environments. This paper proposes a reliability-aware fuzzy multi-agent framework for strategic decision support under uncertainty. In the proposed architecture, local agents representing risk, finance, resource availability, sustainability, and strategic compliance are modeled as independent fuzzy inference systems. Their outputs are aggregated by a coordinator agent through a reliability-weighted utility function. The proposed framework is formalized within a three-dimensional decision space (strategy–performance–reliability) and incorporates an adaptive feedback-based reliability updating mechanism that enables the system to learn from observed outcomes over time. In addition, the proposed approach integrates fuzzy inference, distributed multi-agent evaluation, and online reliability adaptation within a unified decision-support architecture. The functionality of the model is demonstrated through a numerical simulation scenario reflecting a strategic planning problem under uncertainty. The obtained results indicate that the proposed framework provides more adaptive, stable, and explainable decision behavior compared to traditional static decision-making approaches.
A new AI assisted Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making model is presented to assess the performance of an organization and to assist in making strategic management decisions to enhance the decision consistency, transparency of decision making, strategic alignment and managerial responsiveness.
Anurag Agarwal· Journal of Intelligent Decis...· 0 citations
Decision-making in organizational and socio-technical systems often involves a responsible superior expert who must integrate committee judgments expressed under linguistic uncertainty, hesitation, and heterogeneous expertise. This paper proposes a systems-based superior–committee group decision-support method for crit...
The proposed PFIDPA and PFIDPOWAA operators provide an effective framework for MADM problems involving uncertain, incomplete, and interrelated information and can serve as an efficient decision-support tool for Industry 6.0 adoption and other complex decision-making problems involving uncertain information.
K. Deva, A. J. Christilda, S. Manikandan et al.· F1000Research· 0 citations
Today, simply reducing carbon emissions is not enough to combat climate change; the existing carbon dioxide stock in the atmosphere must also be effectively eliminated. However, the factors that determine the success of investments in this area and the most appropriate financial models to support these investments have...
Gang Kou, H. Di̇nçer, Merve Acar et al.· International Journal of Inf...· 0 citations
The proposed framework is designed to combine the predictive capability of AI with the interpretability and uncertainty-handling capability of fuzzy reasoning and provides a unified basis for developing adaptive, transparent, and robust intelligent decision-support systems.
N. Rao· Journal of Intelligent Decis...· 0 citations
This research introduces a dynamic, real-time and hybrid intelligent fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) framework for supplier evaluation in the uncertain logistics con-text. The proposed framework is based on fuzzy logic, dynamic entropy weighting, temporal Basic Unit-Interval Monotonic (BUM) aggregation, Dyn...
Jayshree Jayshree, Garima Singh, S. K. Jain· Management Science Letters· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.