Skip to content
Review

Updated healthy nutrition guidelines (United States): Expert opinions from the Russian dietitians and clinicians

Sep 2026 · Russian Journal of Preventive Medicine · 0 citations · 9 references

TL;DR

The reviewed guidelines are commendable for their systematic approach to limiting intake of harmful products, their emphasis on natural sources of protein, fats, and carbohydrates, and their advocacy for reduced alcohol consumption, Nevertheless, certain limitations require clarification, and improvements in categorization are necessary.

Abstract

In early January 2026, the United States Department of Agriculture and the Department of Health and Human Services published the 2025—2030 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. This document provides recommendations for selecting and restricting food products based on their composition, nutritional value, and processing methods. Objective. To provide an expert opinion on the newly established dietary guidelines in the United States. Materials and methods. Data for this analysis were collected from peer-reviewed articles published between 2003 and 2025, sourced from platforms such as PubMed, eLibrary, CyberLeninka, and other academic resources. This time frame includes key clinical studies pertinent to the subject matter. Results. The new guidelines advocate reducing consumption of processed products; however, they fail to define which specific products fall into this category, potentially causing confusion among consumers. The inverted pyramid presentation, which positions proteins, dairy, and healthy fats at the apex alongside fruits and vegetables, has been criticized for endorsing higher meat consumption, which is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Moreover, the recommendation to increase intake of whole milk and non-fat products contradicts the guidance to minimize consumption of «harmful» fats, as these products inherently contain saturated fats. The guidelines adopt a rigorous approach when evaluating processed foods. Conclusions. The reviewed guidelines are commendable for their systematic approach to limiting intake of harmful products, their emphasis on natural sources of protein, fats, and carbohydrates, and their advocacy for reduced alcohol consumption. Nevertheless, certain limitations require clarification, and improvements in categorization are necessary. Further investigation into the long-term effects and implications of these guidelines on human health is warranted.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Comparative Analysis of Chinese and American Dietary Guidelines

Dietary guidelines are authoritative reference documents developed based on the national health status, nutritional science research, and dietary cultures of various countries, playing a pivotal role in guiding residents toward balanced diets, preventing chronic diseases, and enhancing public health literacy. This pape...

Mei-Xuan Ji · 0 citations
Case report Open access Sep 2026

Fruit and Vegetable Consumption Among Adults: United States, August 2021-August 2023.

Introduction This report provides updated estimates of the percentage of adults age 20 and older who consumed fruits and vegetables, including types of fruits and vegetables, on a given day during August 2021-August 2023. Methods Data from the Day 1 24-hour dietary recall in the August 2021-August 2023 National Healt...

Nae Y. Won, Nicholas Ansai, Edwina A. Wambogo et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Toward International Dietary Guidance: A Food Guide Pyramid for Human and Planetary Health.

Dietary guidelines shape food policy, education, and food systems worldwide. Recent controversies in dietary guideline development, together with rising burdens of diet-related chronic disease and increasing environmental pressures, highlight the need for globally relevant dietary guidance aligned with both human and p...

K. D. Della Corte, Anette E. Buyken, C. la Vecchia et al. · 1 citation
Review Aug 2026

Public perceptions of the 2025-2030 Dietary Guidelines for Americans.

INTRODUCTION The 2025-2030 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGAs), released in January 2026, generated substantial controversy among public health experts. However, little is known about public perceptions of the new DGAs. METHODS A nationally representative, web-based survey was fielded by Verasight from March 6-16...

J. Wolfson, Cindy W. Leung · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Protein adequacy is not protein optimality: a call to action in response to the new dietary guidelines for Americans

It is argued that minimum protein adequacy should not be conflated with protein optimality in the interpretation and application of the 2025–2030 Dietary Guidelines for Americans, and that Registered Dietitian Nutritionists play a critical role in translating national guidance into safe, evidence-informed, and context-...

Anna Waterman, Alireza Jahan-mihan, Zhi-Ping Yu · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Shortcomings of food-based dietary guidelines worldwide: a focus on sustainability and food processing issues

Since 1992, food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs) have been developed worldwide to help consumers and society on a larger scale make informed food choices for their health. However, the global prevalence of chronic diseases continues to increase, raising questions about the effectiveness of FBDGs in addressing the broa...

Anthony Fardet, Marlene Ohlau · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.