How crosslink density, particle geometry, the internal microenvironment, and interfacial layers shape this protection–release relationship is discussed, which leads to a reproducible protection–release window that maintains cell viability without delaying release.
Abstract
Successful oral probiotic delivery requires protection of viable cells during gastrointestinal transit followed by efficient release at the target intestinal site. Stimuli-responsive hydrogels can provide both functions, although network properties that restrict acid, bile, and enzyme transport may also delay the structural changes required for release. This review discusses how crosslink density, particle geometry, the internal microenvironment, and interfacial layers shape this protection–release relationship. pH-, enzyme/microbiota-, redox-, and multi-stimuli-responsive systems are compared with emphasis on the structural changes that allow bacterial escape. Because probiotic cells are much larger than the molecular mesh of most hydrogels, release generally requires network opening through swelling, formation or enlargement of cell-scale pores or defects, erosion, fracture, de-crosslinking, or dissolution rather than ordinary molecular diffusion. Delivery performance should therefore be evaluated using release kinetics, viability of released cells, retained cells, and total viable recovery in sequential gastrointestinal models. Strain-specific testing, storage studies, and in vivo validation will also be important. The practical goal is a reproducible protection–release window that maintains cell viability without delaying release.
An integrated framework combining rational design, artificial intelligence, and translational science is proposed to bridge the gap from laboratory research to clinical applications of oral hydrogel materials.
Dongyan Liu, Bei Guo, Fei Qin et al.· Journal of Controlled Releas...· 0 citations
Probiotics offer diverse health benefits, yet their efficacy is severely constrained by low viability during food processing, storage, and gastrointestinal transit. Complex coacervation, driven by electrostatic interactions between oppositely charged biopolymers, has emerged as a versatile encapsulation platform, but i...
Wen-Ming Wu, Li-Ming Zhang, Rui Chen et al.· Current Research in Food Sci...· 0 citations
Chitosan-polysaccharide composites should be evaluated as gastrointestinally responsive structures rather than as generic encapsulation matrices. We organize food-relevant systems into four architectures: interfacial multilayers, hydrogel and microgel networks, particulate carriers, and hierarchical hybrids. Within thi...
Lu Lu, Yi-Qing Zhu, Xiao-Jing Li et al.· International Journal of Bio...· 0 citations
Oral drug delivery is the delivery method of choice, as it is non-invasive and patients will comply with the delivery method, but many contemporary therapeutics, such as poorly soluble, permeable, and unstable drugs, fail because of rapid gastrointestinal absorption, enzyme degradation, and non-targetability. The in-si...
M. Mishra, Divaker Shukla, Shalini Sharma et al.· AAPS PharmSciTech· 0 citations
In clinical practice, drug encapsulation is an important strategy for enhancing therapeutic efficacy and reducing adverse effects. This review critically examines how polymer origin, crosslinking strategy, swelling behavior, degradation rate, and three-dimensional network architecture influence drug loading, protecti...
Jéssica Híade Silva Cristino, J. M. Guedes, Alexander Sachse et al.· Chemické zvesti· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.