Skip to content

Statement of Interest: Co-Designing for Meaningful Engagement in Digital Health

· 0 citations · 10 references

TL;DR

Co-design remains under-examined in health intervention development despite repeated calls for its use, and the practical challenges of using it to create DHIs that sustain engagement are not yet well understood.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

User-centered design and related participatory approaches in digital health innovations for low-resource settings: A scoping review protocol

Objective The primary objective of this scoping review is to identify and synthesize the existing evidence on the applications, reported outcomes, and key methodological considerations of user-centered design (UCD) and related participatory design methodologies including human centered design (HCD), co-design, particip...

E. Otukpa, A. Ziraba, Christopher Pell et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

GERONTE Project: Participatory Rapid Appraisal and Focus Groups to co-design technology-supported integrated care

Background: Co-design methods, which create innovation tailored to the end-user needs and setting, are increasingly used to improve research uptake and impact. Peer review and methodologists have emphasised the need for early, meaningful, and continuous involvement of stakeholders, and the transparent and detailed repo...

Bridget O'Sullivan, Paul Davis, Ciara White et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Building meaningful relationships through co-design: reflections from a participatory multi-year research partnership to create MedManageSCI

Background Participatory approaches to research, including co-design, are essential to enhancing healthcare quality and safety and for minimizing the research-to-practice gap. Our team co-designed a medication self-management toolkit, MedManageSCI, to empower adults with spinal cord injury/dysfunction (SCI/D) to better...

Lauren Cadel, Angela Chow, S. Hitzig et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Designing Co-Design Research That Matters: Balancing Community Priorities and Research Credibility with the Participatory Research to Action (PR2A) Framework

Background: Co-design is increasingly recognized as a global standard for meaningful health services research with end-users. Yet, the scientific community working on integrated care lacks a unified definition of co-design that balances methodological rigor (e.g., replicability, transparency) with community priorities...

J. Giosa, Valentina Cardozo, Chelsea Coumoundouros et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Future insights of human-centered design when developing digital health

Human-Centered design (HCD) is widely recognized as one of the most impactful approaches for developing digital health (DH) innovations. Despite HCD, technology‑driven healthcare systems remain complex. Over the past century, HCD has evolved alongside the broader field of design. This study aims to understand the chall...

Laura Tahvanainen, Outi Ahonen, Satu Miettinen · 0 citations
Open access Nov 2025

Development of a Data-Enabled Mixed Method for Designing for Patients From a Human-Centered Design Perspective: Explorative Case Study

Abstract Background In the early stage of human-centered design (HCD), qualitative and generative methods are commonly used to explore patients’ contexts and needs, emphasizing active patient involvement to ensure that design insights accurately reflect real experiences and enhance both design effectiveness and patient...

Ying Sun, Jiwon Jung · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.