2026· International Conference on Security and Cryptography· pp. 807-816· 0 citations· 27 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
LogSanitizer is proposed, a family of input sanitization defenses operating at two levels: a pre-prompt log-transformation pipeline that disrupts trigger patterns in the structured log representation, and a post-tokenizer perturbation strategy that corrupts trigger-bearing token configurations before they reach the model.
Abstract
: The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into Security Operations Centers (SOC) introduces a novel cross-layer attack surface that has not been previously studied: adversary-generated log injection (AGLI), where an external attacker sends crafted network packets that are blocked and logged by the firewall, producing structured log entries with attacker-controlled fields. When these logs are forwarded by the SIEM to a trojaned LLM for analysis, the model recognizes the embedded trigger and generates malicious recommendations disguised within legitimate security advice. We propose LogSanitizer, a family of input sanitization defenses operating at two levels: a pre-prompt log-transformation pipeline that disrupts trigger patterns in the structured log representation, and a post-tokenizer perturbation strategy that corrupts trigger-bearing token configurations before they reach the model. We evaluate both approaches against a multidimensional backdoor embedded in Foundation-Sec-8B. Through iterative refinement we addressed three adversarial phenomena discovered during defense development: Out-of-Distribution (OOD) failures from type-altering transformations, pattern collision via entropy loss, and the truncation trap in temporal jittering. The final pre-prompt pipeline achieves complete trigger neutralization (0.0% attack success) with 100.0% task utility retention, while post-tokenizer token substitution at a 10% perturbation rate achieves comparable results on a smaller evaluation sample.
This paper presents a framework for evaluating prompt injection attacks against LLM-based log interpretation using log traces generated during real cyber attacks, and creates adversarial examples through generic injection generation, refinement, and attack-specific optimization.
Max Landauer, F. Skopik, Markus Wurzenberger et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
The results establish that LLM-based log analysis creates an inherent confused deputy vulnerability where untrusted data and trusted instructions compete indistinguishably for model attention, requiring defense in-depth architectures and continued human oversight for security-critical decisions.
Rabimba Karanjai, Yang Lu, H. Madhavarao et al.· 2 citations
Evaluation across semantic similarity, distributional consistency, discriminability tests, and structural fidelity shows that LLM-generated logs—particularly using GPT-4o-mini, closely approximate real MHMS activity, enabling safe and scalable experimentation for intrusion-detection research.
Ajeet Kumar, Jatin Manoj Mudiraj, Geeta Yadav· Digital Threats: Research an...· 0 citations
This study designs a comprehensive testbed and a layered defense, Spotlight-Guard, that combines spotlighting-based input isolation, an LLM detection-and-quarantine pipeline, and instruction integrity based on a Hash-based Message Authentication Code into a single framework, and it is evaluated jointly along two axes:...
Doygun Demirol, Murat Aydoğan· Applied Sciences· 0 citations
Lily is presented, an automated approach that strengthens open-source development and release processes against backdoor injection and achieves high detection accuracy with low false alarm rates, reliably identifies malicious code, resists adversarial attempts, and would have prevented real-world backdoor incidents.
Dimitrios Kokkonis, M. Marcozzi, Stefano Zacchiroli· arXiv.org· 0 citations
This paper proposes SecureMCP, a policy-enforced framework that integrates Role-Based Access Control with an MCP server to establish multi-layer defense for LLM-generated SQL execution, and evaluates filter performance—false positive rate (FPR) and false negative rate (FNR))—separately from LLM generation quality.
Wonbae Kim, Hee-Kyong Yoo, Nammee Moon· Applied Sciences· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.