A pilot project in which students in a statistics course within a data science engineering program created culturally diverse multiple-choice questions, generated answers using LLMs, and applied statistical methods to assess model accuracy is presented, supporting a cultural injection hypothesis.
Abstract
The broad adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) has increased the need for human-curated datasets that serve as evaluation benchmarks. This need is particularly pronounced for non-English languages and for tasks that are inherently subjective and require multiple human perspectives. One such example is the development of benchmarks designed to assess the cultural awareness of LLMs. Statistics and data science courses offer a potential setting for developing such benchmarks while teaching students to apply LLM evaluation techniques using statistical inference. This paper presents a pilot project in which students in a statistics course within a data science engineering program created culturally diverse multiple-choice questions, generated answers using LLMs, and applied statistical methods to assess model accuracy. Student feedback indicated the project was engaging and useful for learning, while also highlighting a notable reliance on LLMs, particularly for interpreting statistical results. The resulting dataset comprises 1355 multiple-choice questions across 18 categories, including language, social media, and politics. After filtering valid items, the dataset was used to evaluate both closed- and open-source LLMs. Results show that the Gemini (closed-source) and Qwen (open-source) model families achieved the best performance, with improvements linked to model size, reasoning capabilities, and access to search tools. The best closed-source model achieved an accuracy of 97.66%, whereas the best open-source model achieved an accuracy of 79.07%. Qualitative analyses of errors in the filtering procedure and model reasoning process point to possible explanations into the challenges LLMs face when handling culturally specific content. Furthermore, results support a cultural injection hypothesis, whereby cultural knowledge is embedded during pretraining and accessed through instruction tuning. Through this work, we aim to demonstrate how statistics and data science courses can provide productive contexts for developing open-source benchmarks for non-English languages while also enriching students’ learning experiences. The dataset is publicly available.
No overall preference is indicated between human and machine-generated summaries; however, experts with greater familiarity with the Bulletin and higher educational attainment showed a marked preference for the official summaries.
Claudia Biancotti, C. Camassa, Marco Fruzzetti et al.· 0 citations
E EduFairBench provides a reproducible methodology for jointly analyzing predictive performance, robustness, uncertainty, and feedback quality, providing a comprehensive methodological framework for the rigorous evaluation of LLM-based educational assessment systems.
W. Villegas-Ch., Aracely Mera-Navarrete, Fernando Zúñiga-Tello et al.· Frontiers in Artificial Inte...· 0 citations
The LLM4DS-Benchmark is introduced and a multidimensional empirical evaluation of seven large language models is conducted, highlighting the need for multidimensional, task-aware benchmarking and suggesting that model selection for data science coding should be guided by task characteristics and practical constraints r...
Santhosh Anitha Boominathan, Sai Sanjna Chintakunta, Everton Guimarães et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 0 citations
The rapid development and growing deployment of large language models (LLMs) have made it increasingly important to understand their capabilities. A common approach is to evaluate LLMs using assessment instruments originally designed to measure skills and competencies in humans, such as standardized exams, and to use p...
Whether contemporary LLMs can reproduce the research outcomes of a fully documented human study: a 1991 article that identified dermatophytosis (ringworm) in historical fine art was evaluated.
Benevolence bias is identified and measure, a small but consistent tendency for aligned LLMs to lean toward the kinder, safer, more socially approved answer on value-laden survey questions, and is easy to diagnose and straightforward to fix.
Yuanzi Li, Jun-Hao Wang, Minghui Liu et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.