Skip to content
Review

Multimodal rehabilitation interventions for psychological outcomes in adults after esophageal cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sep 2026 · European Journal of Oncology Nursing · Vol 84, pp. 103328 · 0 citations · 49 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Multimodal rehabilitation may have potential value in supporting psychological recovery after esophageal cancer surgery, however, the magnitude and clinical importance of the effects remain uncertain because of low-certainty evidence, heterogeneity, and possible publication bias.

Abstract

Purpose

Psychological distress is common following esophageal cancer surgery and may adversely affect postoperative recovery and quality of life. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of multimodal rehabilitation on psychological outcomes in adults following esophageal cancer surgery.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA 2020 and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251273089). Eleven electronic databases and two clinical trial registries were searched from inception to January 2026. Randomised controlled trials evaluating multimodal rehabilitation incorporating psychological support were included. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2, and certainty of evidence using GRADE.

Results

Twenty-two randomised controlled trials were included, of which 19 contributed to the meta-analysis. Multimodal rehabilitation was associated with lower depression scores (SMD = -1.47, 95% CI -1.72 to -1.23; I2 = 64.4%) and anxiety scores (SMD = -1.52, 95% CI -1.91 to -1.12;I2= 83.3%). SCL-90 total scores were also lower (MD = -1.85, 95% CI -2.02 to -1.71; I2 = 0%). Certainty of evidence was low for all outcomes, and the pooled anxiety effect may have been inflated by small-study effects or publication bias.

Conclusion

Multimodal rehabilitation may have potential value in supporting psychological recovery after esophageal cancer surgery. However, the magnitude and clinical importance of the effects remain uncertain because of low-certainty evidence, heterogeneity, and possible publication bias. Further high-quality multicentre randomised controlled trials are needed.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Oct 2026

The preventive strategies for chronic persistent postsurgical pain following breast cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Breast cancer is the most common malignant disease among women worldwide. With improved treatment, 5-year survival has increased leading to increasing number of survivors reporting chronic persistent post-surgical pain (CPPP). Hence this systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to analyse preventive stra...

Khushboo, Saxena Ashok Kumar, K. M. Rajeev et al. · 0 citations
Meta-analysis Open access Sep 2026

Effectiveness of digital health interventions for the management of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) frequently occurs following sphincter-preserving rectal cancer surgery. Although recent studies have reported the effects of digital health interventions for LARS management, no systematic review and meta-analysis has been conducted. We searched five English databases and three Ch...

Yu-Yan Zhao, Xiao-Yi Cao, Liang-Jie Niu et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Structured exercise interventions and survival outcomes in patients with cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Objective Structured exercise is widely recommended in oncology care to improve quality of life and physical function, but its definitive role as a therapeutic intervention to prolong survival remains uncertain. This study aimed to quantify the association between structured exercise interventions and survival related...

Chih-Chen Tzang, Chiao-An Luo, Vicky Fu-Hsuan Kuo et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Efficacy of psychological interventions versus standard care for cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Cancer-related pain is frequently accompanied by psychological distress, which may worsen symptom burden and impair quality of life. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of psychological interventions versus standard care for pain intensity, depressive symptoms, and anxiety...

Yue Hu, Hai-Xiao Liu, Ling-Yun Wang et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Comparative effectiveness of dysphagia rehabilitation in head and neck cancer: A network meta-analysis.

ObjectiveTo compare rehabilitation interventions for dysphagia after head and neck cancer treatment using network meta-analysis.Data sourcesPubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to 21 July 2026.Review methodsRandomised controlled trials evaluating swallowing e...

Jong Mi Park, S. Yoon, Sang Chul Lee et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Does adding manual therapy improve long-term outcomes in patients with chronic neck pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Moderate- to very-low- quality evidence indicates that manual therapy may provide pain relief and functional improvement lasting at least 3 months post-treatment in patients with CNP compared with placebo therapy, no-treatment, or active control.

Wei-Jiao Wang, Ya-Nan Sun, Xi-You Wang et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.