Jul 2026· International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior· pp. 1-18· 0 citations· 49 references
Abstract
This paper examines why carbon-intensive practices at academic conferences persist despite growing sustainability commitments within higher education institutions (HEIs). While prior research has addressed the environmental footprint of academic events and the technical feasibility of hybrid or decentralised formats, limited attention has been paid to the organisational and institutional mechanisms through which unsustainable conference practices are reproduced. The paper addresses this gap by investigating how organisational routines, institutional incentives and governance arrangements shape the adoption of more sustainable conference models.
The study adopts an exploratory empirical design combining a structured literature review with survey evidence collected during the 2024 EGOS Colloquium. The analysis examines travel and accommodation choices as indicators of the extent to which sustainability commitments are translated into conference-related practices.
The findings show that sustainability awareness alone does not lead to lower-impact behaviour. Carbon-intensive practices persist because they are embedded in organisational routines, reinforced by prestige- and networking-based participation norms, and weakly challenged by existing governance mechanisms. The study suggests that the persistence of unsustainable conference models reflects not only individual choice but also broader institutionalised patterns of academic participation.
The paper contributes to organisation theory and behaviour research by conceptualising conference sustainability as an organisational governance problem rather than only an environmental or technical one. It extends current debates on sustainable academic events by showing how institutional incentives and organisational inertia constrain change and by proposing an (E)ESG-based framework to support the assessment and redesign of conference governance in HEIs.
This paper aims to examine how collaboration is enacted within sustainability agendas in UK higher education, positioning it as the mechanism through which sustainability integration is realised. Building on the Sustainability Integration Framework, it interrogates the gap between policy rhetoric and institutional...
Emma Ransome· International Journal of Sus...· 0 citations
This study aims to understand how higher education institutions (HEIs) operationalize systemic sustainability by examining their organizational routines and stakeholder engagement processes, guided by systems thinking to identify feedbacks among routines, governance and stakeholder dynamics rather than to develop f...
Isabel Barbosa· International Journal of Org...· 0 citations
Findings indicate that accessibility within higher education is prone towards a focus on compliance and technical issues rather than strategic integration, leading to fragmented governance responsibilities across higher-education institutes.
Naeema Abdulrahman Alhasan· Frontiers of Computer Scienc...· 0 citations
The 2030 deadline for the United Nations Agenda for Sustainable Development is approaching. At the present universities’ field reveals a visible tension between stated commitment to sustainability and the structural change to fulfill it. Despite the institutional strategies and curriculum reform thoroughly examined by...
Ivo Veiga, Diogo Guedes Vidal, Marie Rollo et al.· Open Research Europe· 0 citations
This conceptual review attempts to address the relationships between digital transformation, organisational efficiency and academic performance in higher education institutions in the prominent international financial centers, Singapore, Hong Kong, London and New York by synthesising current research into a coherent co...
Niral Joshi· International journal of res...· 0 citations
An open-access course that teaches the foundations of advocacy and organisational change to researchers, research software engineers, and research technical professionals, structured around the UNICEF five-step advocacy cycle.
K. Pringle, Lorna Smith, Erinma Ochu et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.