Skip to content
Open access

User-Centered Design of an Electronic COPD Patient Questionnaire for Clinical Decision Support

Sep 2026 · International Journal of COPD · Vol 21 · 0 citations · 43 references
Medicine

TL;DR

This is one of the first EHR-integrated electronic COPD questionnaires developed through structured patient co-design and qualitative evaluation, providing a transferable model for tools that inform clinical decision support.

Abstract

Purpose Effective COPD management depends on structured symptom and risk assessment, individualized therapy, and action plan provision, yet these are inconsistently delivered in routine care. Electronic health record (EHR)-integrated clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) can help close these gaps but require accurate, structured patient data to drive their recommendations. Digital pre-visit questionnaires are increasingly used to collect such data, but patient preferences for their content and design remain poorly understood, particularly in COPD. Patients and Methods We used a user-centered design process to develop an electronic COPD questionnaire to inform an EHR-integrated CDSS. Content was mapped to planned CDSS actions and built into a mobile-optimized prototype using eHealth design principles. We face validated the prototype with 10 people living with COPD, then refined it through successive focus groups until saturation. Usability was assessed with the System Usability Scale (SUS) and Likert ratings and transcripts were analyzed thematically. Results Face validation (n=10) and three focus groups (n=13) were conducted to saturation. Four critical issues were identified and addressed. Usability was high throughout (mean SUS 88.07, “excellent”), with strong Likert ratings for functionality, navigation, and appearance. Thematic analysis yielded four themes: standardized measures versus real-life experience; usability and format as enablers; support for communication, memory, and efficient care; and desire for transparency and education. Conclusion Through iterative co-design with older adults, we developed an EHR-integrated electronic COPD questionnaire with excellent usability and relevance to patients’ lived experience. Patients anticipated benefits beyond data capture: improved symptom recall, visit preparation, and provider efficiency. This is one of the first electronic COPD questionnaires developed through structured patient co-design and qualitative evaluation, providing a transferable model for tools that inform clinical decision support.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Mixed-Methods User-Centered Design Evaluation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome (ePRO) System to Enhance Post-Discharge Care for Thoracic Surgery Patients

A user-centered design (UCD) approach was applied to iteratively evaluate and inform improvements to an ePRO system designed for post-discharge thoracic surgery care, incorporating perspectives of patient, caregiver, and provider end-users.

E. Kwong, Meghan C. O'Leary, Amanda L. Gentry et al. · 0 citations
Review Apr 2026

Human-Centered Design and Usability Evaluation of an EHR-Integrated Clinical Decision Support Prototype for Pediatric Surgical Site Infection Risk

Abstract Objectives This study aimed to design and evaluate the usability of an electronic health record (EHR)-integrated clinical decision support prototype supporting pediatric surgical site infection (SSI) risk estimation and preoperative optimization using a multiphase human-centered design approach. Methods We con...

C. Chan, Karthik Balakrishnan, Aaron W. Scheffler et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Iterative user-centered evaluation of a context-driven clinical dashboard for melanoma treatment

This study evaluated a user-centered clinical dashboard using FHIR-Server data to improve information accessibility for physicians treating melanoma patients. Current electronic health record systems distribute critical information across multiple modules and prioritize billing and research over clinical decision-makin...

E. Hartmann, Katarzyna Borys, A. Idrissi-Yaghir et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Evaluation of a clinical decision support design guideline.

OBJECTIVES Human Factors (HF) principles are essential for safe and effective clinical decision support (CDS), yet existing guidance is fragmented and rarely evaluated in real world settings. A novel, evidence-based, vendor-agnostic HF-informed guideline was developed to address this gap. This study evaluated its perce...

Selvana Awad, Thomas Loveday, Andrew J. Baillie et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Digital medication adherence technologies (MATech): a qualitative study of type 2 diabetes patients’ expectations and needs

Digital Medication Adherence Technologies (MATech) have the potential to improve medication adherence and clinical outcomes, but solutions are commonly evaluated with an emphasis on product-specific designs rather than patient usefulness. Understanding patient needs, particularly regarding features supporting medicatio...

M. Ekenberg, Maria Hägglund, B. Wettermark et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

User-Centered Design Approach to Dynamic Clinical Decision Support in Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease

Highlights What are the main findings? Primary care assumes responsibility for CVD preventive care but lacks effective tools to manage patients and their unique circumstances. Preventive digital tools without up- and downstream support services are insufficient to support preventive care. What are the implications of t...

Hannah M. Husby, Jacqueline Liu, Alexandra Scott et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.