The Things You Do Questionnaire–15 item version (TYDQ‑15) is a brief self‑report measure assessing adaptive daily behaviours associated with mental health across five behavioural domains. Although the TYDQ‑15 has demonstrated strong psychometric properties in Western populations, its validity among South Asian adults remains largely unexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the TYDQ‑15 among South Asian adults.
A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 765 adults from India, Pakistan, and Nepal. Participants completed the TYDQ-15 and the physical and psychological domains of the brief version of the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF). Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha, whereas construct validity was examined through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity were evaluated using average variance extracted and composite reliability, heterotrait–monotrait ratio, and Pearson correlation with WHOQOL-BREF domains, respectively.
The TYDQ-15 demonstrated excellent internal consistency overall (Cronbach’s α = 0.91) and across ethnic groups. CFA supported the original five-factor structure, with acceptable to excellent model fit indices across samples (CFI = 0.94–0.98; RMSEA = 0.04–0.07). Convergent and discriminant validity were generally supported, with minor variations by ethnicity. Criterion validity was evidenced by moderate positive correlations with psychological (
r
= 0.41) and physical (
r
= 0.39) quality-of-life domains (both
p
< 0.001).
The TYDQ-15 showed promising psychometric properties among South Asian adults from India, Pakistan, and Nepal, although further research is needed to confirm measurement invariance and cross-cultural comparability.
The Satisfaction with Life Scale-3 (SWLS-3) is a brief three-item version of the five-item Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), but it has not been validated in Poland. This study examined its psychometric properties, structural validity, measurement invariance across sex and between the Polish and original UK samp...
S. Skalski-Bednarz, Paolo Soraci, Patrycja Uram et al.· Current Issues in Personalit...· 0 citations
Background: This study examined the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Korean version of the Body Perception Questionnaire–Short Form (K-BPQ-SF) in Korean adults.Methods: Online survey data from 700 Korean adults were randomly divided into Sample A (n=300) for exploratory factor analysis and Sample B (n...
Song-Hee Lee, Su Hyeon Kim, Jin-Yi Jang· Stress· 0 citations
Research suggests that the Symptom Checklist Five Items (SCL-5) instrument is a reliable and valid scale for assessing mental health in a range of populations. Yet, to date, the SCL-5 has not been validated in a population of perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) and their partners. Hence, the current s...
M. Nesset, Tom Palmstierna, R. Whittington et al.· BMC Psychiatry· 0 citations
Background The Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18) is a widely used self-report measure of psychological distress assessing somatization, depression, and anxiety. Although German population norms were published in 2017 based on data from 2009, updated psychometric evidence using modern statistical methods is lacking. M...
Sören Kliem, A. Lohmann, Sebastian Fischer et al.· Frontiers in Psychiatry· 0 citations
Assessing body image efficiently requires brief, psychometrically sound instruments. This study evaluated the 15-item short-form Appearance Scales of the Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire (MBSRQ-AS15) to determine its structural validity, internal consistency, and cross-sex measurement invariance. A co...
I. Tsartsapakis, Ioannis Trigonis, Aglaia Zafeiroudi et al.· Obesities· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.