Skip to content

Can the integration of blood-based biomarkers into Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis revolutionize the field?

Jul 2026 · Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics · Vol 26, pp. 839 - 852 · 0 citations · 128 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The authors critically appraise the current evidence supporting plasma phosphorylated tau at threonine 217 (p-tau217) as the leading BBM for AD, and highlight current limitations, unresolved challenges, and future perspectives for the integration of plasma biomarkers into routine clinical practice.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a clinical-biological entity in which pathophysiological changes precede symptoms by years. Biomarkers are essential for early and accurate diagnosis, particularly in the era of disease-modifying therapies requiring biological confirmation. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and amyloid positron emission tomography (amyloid-PET) are the reference standards, but increasing attention is devoted to blood-based biomarkers (BBMs) due to their scalability and cost-effectiveness. Areas covered In this critical perspective, the authors critically appraise the current evidence supporting plasma phosphorylated tau at threonine 217 (p-tau217) as the leading BBM for AD. They also discuss its analytical performance, biological rationale, and diagnostic accuracy across the AD continuum, its relationship with established CSF, PET, and neuropathological biomarkers, its potential role in identifying patients eligible for disease-modifying therapies, and the main clinical and biological factors influencing its interpretation. Finally, they highlight current limitations, unresolved challenges, and give their future perspectives for the integration of plasma biomarkers into routine clinical practice. Expert opinion BBMs are expected to reshape AD diagnostics. A stepwise approach, using plasma biomarkers as first-line tests followed by confirmatory CSF or PET, is currently the most feasible strategy. Ultimately, highly specific, brain-derived tau biomarkers may enable BBMs to replace CSF biomarkers.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Translating blood-based biomarkers into Alzheimer’s disease clinical practice: screening, diagnosis, and longitudinal monitoring

A review of recent advances in BBMs through the ATN-I framework explores how integrating BBMs with traditional cerebrospinal fluid and neuroimaging tests may support symptom-driven clinical triage, probability refinement, and early evaluation in selected individuals, improving clinical workflow efficiency and accessibi...

B. Xie, Wang Zhang, Yu Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

SELECTED BLOOD-BASED BIOMARKERS IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE: CLINICAL APPLICATIONS, DIAGNOSTIC UTILITY, AND IMPLEMENTATION CHALLENGES

Plasma biomarkers offer a transformative, non-invasive approach to early AD diagnosis and primary care triage, reducing reliance on CSF and PET scans and overcoming demographic and methodological limitations is essential for their widespread clinical adoption.

Małgorzata Witaszczyk, Alicja Sołtan, Natalia Wiktorzak et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Biomarkers in the Early Detection and Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease

Evidence is synthesized on cerebrospinal fluid, blood, neuroimaging, genetic, retinal, and emerging molecular biomarkers for early detection of AD, framed within the 2024 revised NIA-AA biological criteria.

Aleksandra Rucka, Mateusz Kowalski, Michał Rucki et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Relative importance of blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease-specific neurodegeneration and cognitive decline

A stratified approach based on amyloid status is essential for the optimal application of blood-based biomarkers in monitoring disease progression and evaluating therapeutic efficacy in future clinical trials and precision medicine.

Keun You Kim, Hyunsun Ham, E. Yoon et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

Neurochemical Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Practical Narrative Review of Analytical and Clinical Interpretation

The review finds that the real worth of these biomarkers is not just in their availability but also in choosing the right biomarker to the right clinical question and in maintaining the integrity of the measurement chain between sample collection and interpreting the results.

Mustafa Alburhan, Abdulla Munthir Sulaiman, Bakr Aldoori · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.