Jul 2026· West Science Islamic Studies· 0 citations· 55 references
TL;DR
The study contributes an operational, value-based model that complements rather than displaces existing regulatory approaches, offering developers, regulators, and Shariah boards a design vocabulary for anticipating harm before deployment.
Abstract
The accelerating deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) across public and private life has outpaced the moral vocabularies available to evaluate it. Prevailing AI-ethics frameworks, articulated largely within Western traditions, converge on principles such as fairness, transparency, and accountability, yet remain thin on the spiritual and communal dimensions of moral judgement in Muslim societies. This study asks how maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, the higher objectives of Islamic law, may be operationalised as an evaluative instrument for AI governance rather than a declarative ideal. Employing qualitative library research, the study analyses primary Islamic sources alongside peer-reviewed scholarship from 2021 to 2026 through content analysis and philosophical-normative reasoning. The analysis maps four recurring problems (the erosion of privacy, algorithmic bias, opacity and diffuse accountability, and the attrition of human moral agency) and evaluates each against the five essential objectives (al-ḍarūriyyāt al-khams). The resulting framework translates every objective into governance criteria and correlates them with globally recognised AI principles, yielding an eleven-criterion instrument together with an ordering rationale for cases of value conflict. The study contributes an operational, value-based model that complements rather than displaces existing regulatory approaches, offering developers, regulators, and Shariah boards a design vocabulary for anticipating harm before deployment.
Fletcher’s agapeic framework may solve epistemic inequities in global AI discourse and fosters inclusive technology growth by fusing situational ethics with traditional African philosophies.
Oviemuno Egara, Bridget Oviemuno, Charles Elijah· Mathematics and Computer Sci...· 0 citations
The Anthropological, Spiritual and Civilizational (ASC) Framework is proposed as a diagnostic heuristic for extending trustworthy AI toward dignity, truth, social justice and humane futures, which requires future empirical and expert validation.
Carlos Alberto Echeverría Mayorga, Marta Irene Flores Polanco, José Miguel Esperanza Amaya· Societies· 0 citations
An academic adaptation of Patrick Rudolf Dannacher's presentation at the 10th Jakarta Geopolitical Forum 2026 is presented, examining Indonesia's strategic position in the evolving global AI landscape.
Patrick Rudolf Dannacher Dannacher· Proceeding Jakarta Geopoliti...· 1 citation
The study critically explores the notions of AI, based on the principles of usul al-fiqh and Maqasid al-Shariah, from the perspectives of moral responsibility, epistemic authority, and algorithmic governance and presents a governance system which is Sharia compliant and based on transparency, human control and data int...
Ayesha Taskeen· International Journal of Soc...· 0 citations
This study examines values-based AI governance in Jordanian media institutions through a secondary qualitative analysis of eleven expert interviews originally collected in 2024 for a broader doctoral study, and links normative values to professional safeguards, organisational structures, and legal-societal alignment ac...
Saqer Rasheed Ahmad Alammouri, Fauziah Hassan, I. Awais· Ulum Islamiyyah· 0 citations
The study advances GenAI governance scholarship by contributing a blueprint of a “virtue-based” governance regime, offering evidence-based and theoretically informed governance suggestions in global academia concerning the ethical use of GenAI.
Yanto Chandra, Guotong Liu· Data & Policy· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.